Steve Jackson Games - Site Navigation
Home General Info Follow Us Search Illuminator Store Forums What's New Other Games Ogre GURPS Munchkin Our Games: Home

Go Back   Steve Jackson Games Forums > Roleplaying > GURPS

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-09-2014, 01:01 PM   #1
mook
 
mook's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Default Mission for Spec Ops - Opinions?

As I'm working on updating the pre-gens for this game, I thought I would also throw out what I'm mulling over for the actual mission for y'all to chew on.

NOTE: If you are playing this game at Strategicon's OrcCon 2014, reading further will be very, VERY spoiler-y!

This is still pretty bare bones, but the gist of things:

The primary objective is to take out a chemical weapons storage facility within Syria, specifically about 10 miles East of the port city of Latakia on the shore of a lake there. The facility is somewhat isolated, and normally garrisoned by a force of 400 soldiers. However, a recent push against the city of Aleppo 100 miles NE by the Free Syrian Army has temporarily drawn off the bulk of those defenders. Only about 30-40 remain, and the CIA SAD has decided to use that window to take out the facility (there may be simultaneous ops going against other sites at the same time, but that doesn't really affect the game).

The team will board a private (CIA) charter flight in Israel, destined for Turkey (a night time flight). En route, they will gear up and parachute out to an LZ a few miles from the facility. After destroying their chutes (thermite? just bury them?), they will make their way (hopefully) undetected to the facility, neutralize any defenders they encounter there, photograph whatever they can/grab hard drives etc., and use Semtex charges at two foundation locations to collapse the building. Once accomplished, they must make their way to a remote site for exfiltration. As there can be no external communications (for concern of being overheard and tied to the U.S.), they must be at the site when the chopper arrives (a re-purposed Russian Mi-26) or they're on their own to get out of the country.

Optional (basically depends on how we're doing on time): On the way to their exfil point, they spot a small convoy carrying a High Value Target like a high-ranking Syrian officer, known war criminal, Hezbollah lieutenant, something like that. Do they have time to take him out and still make it to the LZ!?

The defenders of the primary installation will be standard soldiers of the line -- their main threat is that there are more of them, but presumably the PCs will have the element of surprise. If the team is just mowing them down effortlessly, there may be a small squad of more seasoned troops in the mix with better training and weapons (yes, I'm one of those hippy GMs lol).

The convoy defenders will be tougher, more like peers to the PCs.

A few of the myriad things I'm unsure of:
  • Would the facility defenders be using Night Vision goggles at all times, or just if they were put on alert for some reason?
  • Should the team have to take out the hardlines and use a radio/cell jammer, or just assume they'll be in and out quick enough to avoid reinforcements?
  • I'm think a squad of gear-laden spec ops can hump about 5 mph on foot if they can't commandeer a vehicle?
  • If they do miss their helicopter ride, how would they get out on their own? Just walk over the border into Israel? (I imagine that border is pretty well militarized) Maybe Turkey? Steal a boat to Cyprus? Tunnel deep into the earth and seek assistance from the Mole People?
__________________
How to Be a GURPS GM, author
Game Geekery, Blog (GURPS combat examples, fillable PDF sheets, rules summaries, campaigns and one-shots, beginners' intro)
GURPS Discord, unofficial hangout and real-time chat
mook is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2014, 01:48 PM   #2
johndallman
Night Watchman
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Cambridge, UK
Default Re: Mission for Spec Ops - Opinions?

Quote:
Originally Posted by mook View Post
The primary objective is to take out a chemical weapons storage facility within Syria
Um, blowing up a chemical weapons storage facility will spread the contents all over the area, and depending on what the weather does, may kill a load of people. Blowing up a production facility that hasn't started up yet makes more sense.
Quote:
After destroying their chutes (thermite? just bury them?)
Burry them. Thermite generates bright lights and bright lights at night are a really bad idea for a covert mission.
Quote:
Only about 30-40 remain ... they will make their way (hopefully) undetected to the facility, neutralize any defenders they encounter there, photograph whatever they can/grab hard drives etc., and use Semtex charges at two foundation locations to collapse the building.
They need to make very sure that the site's communications are taken out, as one phone call saying there are foreign attackers makes life much harder for the politicians. So that's jammers for the Syrian army's radios and for soldiers' own cellphones, and cutting all the telephone and long-distance networking cables, before anyone at the facility knows anything's up. If this is insufficiently Action!, or too much complexity for the timeslot, add an NPC support team to do it.
Quote:
Would the facility defenders be using Night Vision goggles at all times, or just if they were put on alert for some reason?
Depends on how much budget they have, and how well organised their supply officer is.
Quote:
I'm think a squad of gear-laden spec ops can hump about 5 mph on foot if they can't commandeer a vehicle?
Not for very far at that pace.
Quote:
Just walk over the border into Israel? (I imagine that border is pretty well militarized)
It's a bit less militarised than the DMZ in Korea. But only a bit.
Quote:
Maybe Turkey?
Less militarised, but still significantly. Lebanon will be a better bet, but is not terribly safe territory. The CIA can probably provide routes that will work, but that information would be terribly embarrassing if it was captured.
Quote:
Steal a boat to Cyprus?
The ex-SEAL will be up for that, but it's not a short voyage. If they are being chased, they'll be in dead trouble once day breaks at sea.
Quote:
Tunnel deep into the earth and seek assistance from the Mole People?
<fnord>
johndallman is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2014, 02:51 PM   #3
Captain Joy
 
Captain Joy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Heartland, U.S.A.
Default Re: Mission for Spec Ops - Opinions?

Quote:
Originally Posted by mook View Post
Optional (basically depends on how we're doing on time): On the way to their exfil point, they spot a small convoy carrying a High Value Target like a high-ranking Syrian officer, known war criminal, Hezbollah lieutenant, something like that. Do they have time to take him out and still make it to the LZ!?
Maybe the high-value target is a chemical weapon scientist. Or, maybe it's a high-value prisoner that we would like to liberate.
Captain Joy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2014, 02:52 PM   #4
mook
 
mook's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Default Re: Mission for Spec Ops - Opinions?

Quote:
Originally Posted by johndallman View Post
Awesomeness snipped
I was thinking more of an "implosion," like when they collapse a building on a city block, to bury everything under tons of rubble, but I do like the idea of a pre-operational production plant. Feels like it "means more" if they succeed. Cool!

No thermite, makes sense. Cut/jam comms, makes sense - maybe even the power as well, particularly if the enemy N/V isn't up to par. Not sure yet whether to lean towards the PCs doing it themselves or having an NPC team give 'em a hand (actually, even as I type I'm thinking that any time the PCs can do more firsthand, probably the more fun!)

I was blindly ballparking the squad speed at 5mph on an average marathoners speed of 6.5mph, but yeah, 3mph might be better to work with.

Lebanon seems a good bet -- maybe I'll even move the whole operation south and put the exfil LZ in Lebanon instead of Syria itself.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Captain Joy View Post
Maybe the high-value target is a chemical weapon scientist. Or, maybe it's a high-value prisoner that we would like to liberate.
Mm, having to cart along a prisoner for those last few miles could make things interesting!
__________________
How to Be a GURPS GM, author
Game Geekery, Blog (GURPS combat examples, fillable PDF sheets, rules summaries, campaigns and one-shots, beginners' intro)
GURPS Discord, unofficial hangout and real-time chat
mook is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2014, 02:55 AM   #5
The Colonel
 
The Colonel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Default Re: Mission for Spec Ops - Opinions?

Naismith's rule is 4mph over level ground + 1 minute per contour line if that helps, and is meant to be a good walking pace ... not unreasonable to expect special ops to beat that, but given heavy kit and night ops you might take it as your baseline.

For plot complications, add in a meeting with FSA troops, which just happen to include one or more high value Al Qaeda members, thus adding to their dilemma (and, meta wise, acknowledging the moral complexity of the conflict).

Pickup could easily be boat out to a submarine - or pickup by the Israelite Navy, or even just exfil to an area that's clean enough for a Pave Low to come in and scoop them up. Hell, you could even use skyhooks if there are still any kicking about...
The Colonel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2014, 07:39 AM   #6
cosmicfish
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Default Re: Mission for Spec Ops - Opinions?

Quote:
Originally Posted by mook View Post
Would the facility defenders be using Night Vision goggles at all times, or just if they were put on alert for some reason?
Defenders will usually NOT be wearing goggles - there are all kinds of problems with goggles (expense, weight, limited FOV, battery life) that are only really worth it in certain circumstances, like when you want to conceal your presence AND see in the dark. But whether it is known as a chemical plant or not, the facility will be obvious, and heavy exterior lighting makes more sense than hanging goggles on everyone.

Quote:
Originally Posted by mook View Post
Should the team have to take out the hardlines and use a radio/cell jammer, or just assume they'll be in and out quick enough to avoid reinforcements?
That depends a bit on how close the reinforcements are, but realistically the team should cut the hardlines early on, leaving the radio/cell jamming to a specialist team.

Quote:
Originally Posted by mook View Post
I'm think a squad of gear-laden spec ops can hump about 5 mph on foot if they can't commandeer a vehicle?
Yes. When I was younger I did a lot of backpacking, and without special preparation I was able to hump a 70lb pack through 20 miles of the lower Rockies in about 4 hours. I see no reason to expect special ops to do less.

Quote:
Originally Posted by mook View Post
If they do miss their helicopter ride, how would they get out on their own? Just walk over the border into Israel? (I imagine that border is pretty well militarized) Maybe Turkey? Steal a boat to Cyprus? Tunnel deep into the earth and seek assistance from the Mole People?
If they are SAD, then they are trained in a wide variety of exfil techniques, but they will probably have a couple of back-up group extraction sites planned - perhaps the helo will be at site A 0500-0525, be at site B 0530-0600, and there will be an SDV team ready to pick up at a nearby beach 0730-0800 if the helo is unsuccessful.
cosmicfish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2014, 11:31 AM   #7
TheOneRonin
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Default Re: Mission for Spec Ops - Opinions?

The other posters have already covered your questions, and I like the idea of the post-mission opportunity.

One thing to keep in mind is you should always be ready to throw a monkey wrench into the operation. Most covert ops never go as planned, and the mark of this caliber of special operator is the ability to improvise and deal with the unexpected/unplanned.

And one more thing about cutting the hard lines. Be careful of the timing. Do it too early, and security may figure out that something is wrong and be more on their guard.

And once the guards figure out they can't call for help, be ready to deal with people trying to make a break for it. This means the team should be able to deal with vehicles trying to escape.
TheOneRonin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2014, 12:13 PM   #8
The Colonel
 
The Colonel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Default Re: Mission for Spec Ops - Opinions?

Another good wrinkle - the site is actually online and blowing it up will send the whole grid square NBC red...
The Colonel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2014, 02:06 PM   #9
safisher
Gunnery Sergeant,
 Imperial Marines
Coauthor,
 GURPS High-Tech
 
safisher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Default Re: Mission for Spec Ops - Opinions?

Quote:
Originally Posted by mook View Post
take out the facility
The US generally uses Tomahawk cruise missiles for that, historically. I would think the ops for SAD would more in line with either on-site covert intel which can't be trusted from either source, or hostage taking, or hostage rescue. If the group goes in on foot, have them do some recon of the site (take samples of the chems, or photo the barels, etc.), rescue some international aid folks being used as hostages, and/or capture a chemical scientist. If it's just an attack, the missiles could do that, IMO.

Quote:
En route, they will gear up and parachute out to an LZ a few miles from the facility.
They can fly through the night on their parachutes, wearing NVGs and shooting with silenced weapons on the final approach before landing on the roof.

Quote:
photograph whatever they can/grab hard drives etc.,
Yes.

Quote:
and use Semtex charges at two foundation locations to collapse the building.
I'd skip this part. If they get good intel maybe they get the satisfaction of watching this place blowup from the safety of a Predator feed beamed to carrier in the Med.

Quote:
remote site for exfiltration
Capture a truck or meet a local who has a truck. Ditch the mission equipment and pose as journalists or aid workers, visit a refuge camp, and exfil that way. That or do something flashy -- like a Pavelow exfil, SDV, JPADs delivery of paraglider, etc. http://www.paramotors-usa.com/102/pr...ifications.php


Quote:
convoy carrying a High Value Target like a high-ranking Syrian officer, known war criminal, Hezbollah lieutenant, something like that.
The electronic comms the team will have probably cannot be compromised when transmitting, but if they are captured, it will ID them.

Quote:
The convoy defenders will be tougher, more like peers to the PCs.
I would doubt anyone of that caliber is available, but a notch above the line troops is possible. They may be very capable mercs of an international variety, too, but not equals to the SAD guys.

Quote:
Should the team have to take out the hardlines and use a radio/cell jammer, or just assume they'll be in and out quick enough to avoid reinforcements?
All of the above.
__________________
Buy my stuff on E23.
My GURPS blog, Dark Journeys, is here.
Fav Blogs: Doug Cole here , C.R. Rice's here, & Hans Christian Vortisch here.
safisher is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2014, 03:12 PM   #10
TheOneRonin
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Default Re: Mission for Spec Ops - Opinions?

Quote:
Originally Posted by safisher View Post
The US generally uses Tomahawk cruise missiles for that, historically. I would think the ops for SAD would more in line with either on-site covert intel which can't be trusted from either source, or hostage taking, or hostage rescue. If the group goes in on foot, have them do some recon of the site (take samples of the chems, or photo the barels, etc.), rescue some international aid folks being used as hostages, and/or capture a chemical scientist. If it's just an attack, the missiles could do that, IMO.

It's gonna be really hard to maintain plausible deniability if you level a facility in sovereign nation nation with a cruise missile from an Arleigh Burke class destroyer. What I get from the OP is that this op is supposed to be covert, hence them trying to bring weapons and gear that don't immediately ID them as US/NATO.


Quote:
They can fly through the night on their parachutes, wearing NVGs and shooting with silenced weapons on the final approach before landing on the roof.
What was that movie...Air Force one with Harrison Ford, I think. It was an HVT extraction by some Tier 1 guys...but they did the same sort of roof infil that you are talking about. It's a little Hollywood, but sure would be fun in this kind of game.

Though lighting conditions on the building may cause a problem. They would also need a another ground team to cut the land lines to the building.


Quote:
I would doubt anyone of that caliber is available, but a notch above the line troops is possible. They may be very capable mercs of an international variety, too, but not equals to the SAD guys.
Agreed here. You'd be hard pressed to find SAD equivalents outside of any 1st world country, if at all. Army Ranger equivalent is much more likely.
TheOneRonin is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
covert ops, special ops

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Fnords are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:51 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.