10-07-2013, 10:30 PM | #1 |
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Buffalo, New York
|
[SPACE] World Trade
Hello Folks,
I'm guessing that there are others who have utilized the world building rules from GURPS SPACE for 4e and that they've worked out some potential issues already... Question: can a world with say, 18 trade partners within relatively easy reach of space travel, each taking up say, 9% of the world's Economic volume by trade, have a trade level that is 18 x 9% or 162% of the world's economic volume? Is Trade limited to having to be UNDER 100% of its Economic volume and that it can't have trade with more than a handful simply because the trade would reach levels that the world just can't sustain?
__________________
Newest Alaconius Lecture now up: https://www.worldanvil.com/w/scourge-of-shards-schpdx Go to bottom of page to see lectures 1-11 |
10-07-2013, 10:53 PM | #2 |
Join Date: Dec 2007
|
Re: [SPACE] World Trade
Well in real life there are certainly places that exist primarily as convenient places for people from all over to come and trade with each other, so it's possible. But I generally assume that trade only happens between close-by partners to avoid the trade volume tending to infinity.
|
10-08-2013, 08:01 AM | #3 |
Hero of Democracy
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: far from the ocean
|
Re: [SPACE] World Trade
make sure you are dividing the value by distance for each world, and then consider lowering the value of K.
And how big is this world compared to the others?
__________________
Be helpful, not pedantic Worlds Beyond Earth -- my blog Check out the PbP forum! If you don't see a game you'd like, ask me about making one! |
10-08-2013, 02:09 PM | #4 | |
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Oz
|
Re: [SPACE] World Trade
Quote:
To get things really right, use a multinomial logit model with income and generalised transport cost as the explanators to divide each world's output between the possible consumers. |
|
10-08-2013, 02:16 PM | #5 |
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Berkeley, CA
|
Re: [SPACE] World Trade
Eh, I'm not sure that follows, though any power greater than 3 at least results in finite total trade. Dividing by the square is probably from Far Trader, which was generalizing models used for terrestrial trade and doesn't entirely work even there.
|
10-08-2013, 02:32 PM | #6 |
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Rochester, MN
|
Re: [SPACE] World Trade
Wow. If ever there was a sentence to make me feel dumb...Could you elaborate on this a little bit, speaking in small words? Maybe supplying a formula with variable definitions in GURPS terms?
|
10-08-2013, 02:56 PM | #7 | |
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Oz
|
Re: [SPACE] World Trade
Quote:
The tails of the logistic function are asymptotic to exponential decays, so in a universe where transport costs are significant compared to the prices of goods, and trade volumes are correspondingly small it would probably be okay to use an exponential of the generalised cost of transport if a logistic function were too tough for you, but this will not allow you to treat the split between domestic consumption and export endogenously. Yes, correct, you are right. Trade economists use gravity models in which the trade volume on a country pair is the product of their GDPs divided by the square of the transport costs between them, not logit models. And yes, I am a transport economist, not a trade economist. My explanation is as follows. (1) Discrete choice theory is not adequately covered in training economists. When I was doing this sort of stuff I had to go to marketing theory to get the mathematics I wanted, and I found that none of my colleagues were aware of the hedonic discrete choice or the theoretical connections between discrete choice and probit and logit models. The trade economists are probably mostly not aware of the possibility of using logit models (2) Gravity models of trade have no theoretical foundation, they are an empirical fit and not an especially good one; the data is thin, its range is narrow, and its disturbances (owing to cultural factors, historical trade relations, etc.) large enough that the statistics can pick the curvature as more than 1/x but can't distinguish the higher polynomial terms. Take that with all the salt you like. |
|
10-08-2013, 03:11 PM | #8 |
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Berkeley, CA
|
Re: [SPACE] World Trade
Even there, I think you need a model for how price varies with place -- in extreme cases, if everything you want can be made locally for the same price it would be available in trade, there's no reason to ever trade, and if something is necessary, has only a single source, and has no adequate substitutes, you'll trade however far is necessary. A gravity trade model should come naturally out of certain models for the price and variance in price of goods.
|
10-08-2013, 03:51 PM | #9 | ||
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Oz
|
Re: [SPACE] World Trade
I'm sorry. You shouldn't feel dumb. It's not especially clever, just highly specialised knowledge. Unless you work in marketing research there's no particular reason that you ought to know about hedonic pricing, discrete choice, or logit models.
Quote:
Quote:
Following a whole bunch of assumptions about the values that different consumers place on different goods, it looks as though unless there are special demands for goods from particular places at particular places, the probability that a particular item produced at world 1 will end up being consumed on world 2 ought to be proportional to P(1, 2) = V2 / (1 - exp (k.G(1, 2) + l)) space for format* and therefore that the volume of exports from 1 to 2 ought to be proportional to T(1, 2) = V1.V2/(1 - exp (k.G(1, 2) + l) Where V1 is the economic volume of world 1, V2 is the economic volume of world 2, k and l are unknown constants, and G(a, b) is the generalised cost of transporting goods from producers on world a to consumers on world b. This does apply to P(1, 1). So having settled on values of k and l you can sum all the T(1, b) and divide that into V1 and get the constant of proportionality for the equations above. That means that the model itself will tell you what proportion of world X's output is consumed locally and what proportion exported (which gravity models will not do). Note: * Since in equilibrium everything produced is consumed or invested somewhere, the sum of all the probabilities P(1, x) including x = 1 must be one. Last edited by Agemegos; 10-08-2013 at 04:05 PM. |
||
10-08-2013, 04:00 PM | #10 | |
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Oz
|
Re: [SPACE] World Trade
Quote:
It is possible that idiosyncratic demands (treated as part of the disturbance in this model) might by chance mimic the results of a gravity model. But the hierarchial multinomial logit does not converge to gravity. |
|
Tags |
space, trade |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|