![]() |
![]() |
#41 | |
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Brighton
|
![]() Quote:
It's got plenty of range and is accurate so you won't need to wait for the bear to get close But if you in dense woods again a powerful shotgun with slugs for that tasty pi++ damage mod, Franchi SPAS 15 comes out in 86' *against bears HP or frangible Last edited by Tomsdad; 03-15-2016 at 07:31 AM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#42 | ||
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Iceland*
|
![]() Quote:
Maybe semi-automatic is not the way to go. Lever-action is fast enough, especially if the magazine is big. ROF 2 and Shots 8+1 would beat ROF 3 and Shots 3+1 all hollow. Even bolt action may be acceptable, as long as the ammunition capacity and/or speed to reload are good. Quote:
I was figuring a Remington 870 with a 7+1 capacity and sights for slugs, an SKS or maybe a Ruger or AR-15 design in a decent deer caliber and maybe a Brno 602 (CZ 550) in a practical bear-killing caliber, especially if he could get a 5 round detachable magazine. Other options might be a heavy-caliber lever-action, like the Winchester '95 or the Marlin 444. A lot of fairly affordable options in modern .45-70 chamberings exist, but few real customers are looking for high ammunition capacity. How practical is getting an extended tubular magazine with Shots 6+ in a good bear-killing caliber? Edit: Seems you can get a Shots 6+1 or even a Shots 7+1 .45-70 lever-action pretty easily, so I'm thinking lever-action is the way to go. Fits the character, too. Old school. He'd own an old .30-30 lever-action and some kind of varmint gun already, from when he was a kid.
__________________
Za uspiekh nashevo beznadiozhnovo diela! Last edited by Icelander; 03-15-2016 at 03:55 AM. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#43 |
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: New Zealand.
|
![]()
I remember something about a .458 Winchester magnum in a lever action can't remember the details (or find them on a quick search) I think the round was unpopular in the 80's so it may have been cheap then.
__________________
Waiting for inspiration to strike...... And spending too much time thinking about farming for RPGs Contributor to Citadel at Nordvörn |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#44 | |
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Iceland*
|
![]() Quote:
I think it makes sense for my hypothetical character to have a .45-70 lever-action with an extended tube magazine, maybe a Marlin 1895 with a 18.5" barrel and Shots 6+1, as one of his anti-bear guns. His CQC anti-bear gun would be a 12G 3" shotgun with an extended magazine, at least Shots 7+1. It might not be too implausible for him to have bought a gun through Canada in the 1980s and obtained something like a Brno or Mauser action in .404 NE/Jeffery or a similar gun in something up to .416 Rigby or .500 Jeffery. What would be the best combination of economical price point and good performance in the 1980s for something that was functionally equivalent to the Mannlicher-Schönauer Grosswildbüchse in 12.7x70mm Schüler in GURPS terms?
__________________
Za uspiekh nashevo beznadiozhnovo diela! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#45 |
Join Date: Feb 2012
|
![]()
BAR Safari .300 or .338 WM? Was it already in production during the eighties?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#46 | |
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: The plutonium rich regions of Washington State
|
![]() Quote:
If you really don't like uranium for some reason, tungsten, tungsten carbide, iridium, osmium, platinum, and gold all have the density. Gold might be a bit too deformable for high penetration against hard armor, but at the low velocity you will get from a shotgun I doubt you'd see much difference in any of the others. Don't expect to see pyrophoric action from uranium at these speeds, either. Luke |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#47 |
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: MO, U.S.A.
|
![]()
Honestly, a competent shooter ought to do fine with the .30-.30. Especially if they only face black bears, brown/grizzly bears are unlikely in most of the lower 48 states in the U.S. in 1986.
__________________
Xenophilia is Dr. Who. Plus Lecherous is Jack Harkness.- Anaraxes |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#48 | |
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Brighton
|
![]()
Aha fair enough!
Quote:
Edit: actually taking you point about it being low velocity, what's your opinion on the effectiveness of such rounds from a shotgun, would you keep tha x1.5 & x1.7 bonus? Last edited by Tomsdad; 03-15-2016 at 01:33 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#49 | |
Join Date: Oct 2004
|
![]() Quote:
http://www.petersenshunting.com/gear...nemo-omen-458/ |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#50 | |
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Brighton
|
![]() Quote:
anyone any guesses what the stats for that might be? Last edited by Tomsdad; 03-16-2016 at 06:10 AM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Tags |
cover ops, high-tech, modern firepower, monster hunters, tactical shooting |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|