07-23-2010, 09:04 AM | #31 | |
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Stuttgart, Germany
|
Re: REALLY Difficult Locks
Quote:
If you aren't worried about hurting the lock you can jimmy it much faster than you can pick it, and for cars the issue is generally the alarm, not the lock. |
|
07-23-2010, 09:57 AM | #32 | |
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Houston
|
Re: REALLY Difficult Locks
Quote:
This is similar to what I had in mind for picking a basic High School padlock. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1eGxRQlWTrM Its open at 2:22. Nymdok |
|
07-23-2010, 10:11 AM | #33 | |
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Stuttgart, Germany
|
Re: REALLY Difficult Locks
Quote:
It's generally the difference between making the tumblers move to the unlock position in a lock and using a credit card to push back the latch, or other brute force method to pry open a lock... |
|
07-23-2010, 10:32 AM | #34 | |
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Houston
|
Re: REALLY Difficult Locks
Quote:
I would probably call the video a basic lock with improvised tools. Someone with 1 point in Lockpick and avg IQ could pick it reliably. Nymdok |
|
07-23-2010, 10:39 AM | #35 |
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Berkeley, CA
|
Re: REALLY Difficult Locks
Traditionally, 'jimmying' a lock refers to opening it with a jimmy, aka a crowbar. It often doesn't involve picking the lock at all, just damage to the door and doorframe. I wouldn't call opening a lock with a credit card jimmying.
|
07-23-2010, 02:30 PM | #36 |
Wielder of Smart Pants
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Ventura CA
|
Re: REALLY Difficult Locks
I've asked this before, but why exactly do you think that equipment quality is open ended?
|
07-23-2010, 02:59 PM | #37 | |
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Houston
|
Re: REALLY Difficult Locks
Quote:
The idea of a skill 15 having a 50/50 shot of picking Fort Knox in an hour just didnt sit well with me. I was unhappy with the idea that locks (in high tech) only come in 5,0,-5. It seemed kind of unsatisfying being so discrete, and since you and i had freshly dissagreed on the subject in the other thread, I figured I'd noodle over it and see what I got for my troubles. I started to think about what kind of lock difficulty would be tough for someone with a Lockpick skill of 25, and , not so much what that lock might be like (Im not a locksmith myself), but who would use that lock and be able to afford it. Thats where I came up with the idea of -20 (Which I then reduced down to -15 based on your TL suggestion) Then I went the other way and asked whats simpler than a basic lock? novelty handcuffs and slotted bathroom doorlocks came to mind and I thought, could someone, even a particularly dense someone, pick this lock? I figure someone with IQ 9 could pick it with certainty. From there, I fit a curve to the data using the listed cost modifiers a few different ways (as seen in the first post) and found numbers that I thought were smooth and reasonable. Then we wound up here :) To address directly your question about the quality of lockpicking equipment, As I said above, Im going to stick to the +2, with a few possible exceptions (Lockpick gun for Basic Locks +4, Maybe even a Slim Jim for car doors +4?). Nymdok |
|
07-23-2010, 03:20 PM | #38 |
Wielder of Smart Pants
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Ventura CA
|
Re: REALLY Difficult Locks
|
07-23-2010, 03:38 PM | #39 | |
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Houston
|
Re: REALLY Difficult Locks
Quote:
Id be curious too. PM Him? EDIT:PMed him. Edit Edit: Slim Jim Nymdok Last edited by Nymdok; 07-23-2010 at 03:47 PM. |
|
07-23-2010, 03:40 PM | #40 |
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Berkeley, CA
|
Re: REALLY Difficult Locks
Because skill is open ended? Realistically, there's an upper limit to both, and with current technology the upper limit to non-forcible lockpicking is lower than the upper limit on lock quality.
|
Tags |
difficulty, locks, modifiers |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|