05-04-2020, 09:12 AM | #1 |
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: England
|
[Ultra-Tech] Non-lethal non-superscience beam weapons
I was looking through Ultra-Tech and I'm curious whether I'm missed some errata or not. Neither Sonic Stunners (UT125) nor Omni-Blasters (UT124) have the superscience ^ symbol.
I can just about accept the idea of a charged particle beam being able to reproduce the effect of an electrolaser, but I'm not convinced by sonic stunners. Are these both plausible technologies or are they really superscience and just errors in my pdf copy? |
05-04-2020, 09:25 AM | #2 |
Join Date: Jun 2013
|
Re: [Ultra-Tech] Non-lethal non-superscience beam weapons
For omniblasters, my guess is that the beam involves fewer particles and/or a lower velocity, but is highly electrically charged to sort of "zap" the target. It might not be superscience, but I wouldn't object to calling it such, or at least noting it's probably cinematically effective. I'm pretty certain the sonic stunners are based on current understandings of the effects of sound waves on the nervous system; they probably lean toward cinematic, but I wouldn't call them superscience.
__________________
GURPS Overhaul |
05-04-2020, 09:39 AM | #3 | ||
Hero of Democracy
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: far from the ocean
|
Re: [Ultra-Tech] Non-lethal non-superscience beam weapons
Quote:
I agree. If you want more realistic rules, the electrolaser is probably the best place to look. Quote:
__________________
Be helpful, not pedantic Worlds Beyond Earth -- my blog Check out the PbP forum! If you don't see a game you'd like, ask me about making one! |
||
05-04-2020, 09:58 AM | #4 | |
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Berkeley, CA
|
Re: [Ultra-Tech] Non-lethal non-superscience beam weapons
Quote:
|
|
05-04-2020, 10:07 AM | #5 |
Join Date: Aug 2007
|
Re: [Ultra-Tech] Non-lethal non-superscience beam weapons
Probably some of the subtler overlooked things in UT. Also note that all sonic weapons are LC4 regardless of whether they are stunners or screamers. If I were restricting weapons I'd go for screamers early in the process.
__________________
Fred Brackin |
05-04-2020, 11:59 AM | #6 | |
Join Date: Jun 2006
|
Re: [Ultra-Tech] Non-lethal non-superscience beam weapons
Quote:
I've pointed out before there is a STRONG selective pressure to narrow the gap between unconscious/disabled and dead - because in the real world things attacking you are usually looking for a meal, and if they can successfully disable without killing you they are going to go on to kill you anyway. An exploitable pathway that renders you unable to continue the fight before the damage is so bad you are going to die anyway is an evolutionary flaw. Resources that went into whatever it is that keeps you alive after you've been disabled are wasted, you should have died at the moment you became disabled, having spent those resources on something reproductive before that instead.
__________________
-- MA Lloyd |
|
|
|