10-13-2021, 12:51 AM | #21 |
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Platform Zero, Sydney, Australia
|
Re: Destiny: What would a world dominated by it look like?
Yeah, phrasing it as "bring balance to the Force" is weird when it's not like the Light is portrayed as being a harmony of multiple aspects and the Dark a disharmony.
Last edited by The Benj; 10-13-2021 at 12:57 AM. |
10-13-2021, 03:53 PM | #22 | |
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Central Florida
|
Re: Destiny: What would a world dominated by it look like?
Quote:
As I studied the Michale Cule's first two posts, I interpreted that the Destiny his world had as being exclusively 'positive' destinies. That may have been an error on my part.
__________________
(Censored) |
|
10-13-2021, 04:23 PM | #23 |
Join Date: Jul 2005
|
Re: Destiny: What would a world dominated by it look like?
I don't think that's what I was intending. (Though my thoughts on this go through a lot of cycles.) I think the risk of an unambigously bad prophecy would be what kept the practice from being universal.
__________________
Michael Cule,
Genius for Hire, Gaming Dinosaur Second Class |
10-13-2021, 04:37 PM | #24 |
Join Date: Dec 2007
|
Re: Destiny: What would a world dominated by it look like?
Even if it was, equal power is not the same thing as equal numbers as Palpatine demonstrated when five Jedi went after him and he used them as chew toys.
|
10-14-2021, 08:15 PM | #25 | ||
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: UK
|
Re: Destiny: What would a world dominated by it look like?
Quote:
Quote:
"Destinies" like that should probably all be represented by 0-point features if you're playing it in GURPS, because until they happen it's impossible to tell whether the event is going to be good or bad or how big it will be.
__________________
Looking for online text-based game at a UK-feasible time, anything considered, Roll20 preferred. http://forums.sjgames.com/showthread.php?t=168443 Last edited by Inky; 10-14-2021 at 08:21 PM. |
||
10-15-2021, 02:41 AM | #26 |
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Sweden, Stockholm
|
Re: Destiny: What would a world dominated by it look like?
My Fantasy setting runs on a kind of Destiny system.
A notable feature is that it can be powerful but never completely absolute. Most Destinies could be given a level of potency where 2 is normal and 6 is basically super-rare divine decree. "Fated" important people usually have 4-5. There is also the feature where the more specific a destiny is the more powerful it is practically. Basically "low destiny" people might have destinies along the lines of "die from an infected wound" and "Become locally known for skilled craftsmanship". These kind of destinies seem pretty much random, and are more like a gentle (but constant) push in that direction. A lot of people don't fulfill their destinies at all. The strongest destinies are the ones which are set by godlike entities. It is quite common for these to be crafted to counter the plots other godlike entities, especially due to specific destinies being innately more potent. F.ex. let's say we have a Dragon called Bob with the destiny "reduce humankind of ashes". Bob is fairly likely to get beaten by a spunky human with an equally strong Destiny that just says "Kill Bob the Dragon" if both end up in a direct confrontation. This despite the dragon being vastly more powerful. The actual Player characters are Fateless though, which is basically Destiny NULL and basically makes destiny useless against them. They can still weaponize Fate against other characters though, especially the mage that knows magic that can mess with people with a weak Fate. In practice having a stronger (and relevant) "Fate" than someone and your Fates means getting +2 to all rolls against them (and they get -2 to all rolls to resist/defend) per level your Fate is higher. A super specific Fate counts as being two levels higher when relevant. Example: A Potency 6 Hercules-type character with a Fate to "Slay monsters and be amazing at everything" getting into a Cooking competition with a Potency 3 Cook with a Fate to "Become renowned as a chef". Hercules gets no potency bonus since his Fate is generic as all heck. The Cook has an effective Potency of 4 (3+1) since his Fate is quite relevant. Since Herc still has 2 levels higher Fate the Cook will be making all cooking rolls at -4 while Herc will make them at +4. ------------------------------ To answer the actual topic question... The regular (Fate 2) people of the world generally see themselves as pawns or bystanders in something greater. Whenever someone who seems to be a hero (or villain/monster) comes around they tend to get out of the way. Doesn't matter if they are expert fighters with 16 in combat skills when their weaker Fate will doom them anyway. The Fated often view themselves as greater than everyone else, often including non-Fated nobility. Due to their massive bonuses from Fate it is also not uncommon for Fate 5 wandering heroes to go around with pathetic skills like Broadsword-9. Their massive +6 bonus and -6 penalty to Fate 2 opponents make them feel undefeatable anyway. (Fate 5 character often have special powers granted by some godlike entity as well). With this in mind Fateless characters (like the PCs) are of course an absolute walking disaster waiting to happen.
__________________
"Prohibit the taking of omens, and do away with superstitious doubts. Then, until death itself comes, no calamity need be feared" |
10-21-2021, 04:48 AM | #27 |
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: UK
|
Re: Destiny: What would a world dominated by it look like?
I'm not sure how having no Destiny would make a lot of difference if people who did have a Destiny only had one Destiny and everything that didn't relate to it was up for grabs. For instance, if you have no Destiny and you're planning to fight a dragon, surely you're in the same boat as anyone else whose Destiny doesn't mention dragons one way or the other, and at less of an advantage than somebody who's Destined to live to marry and have three children and hasn't done it yet.
On the other hand, if having no Destiny means that you can defy the rules of Destiny in general, and, for instance, kill someone who was Destined not to be killed yet or rescue somebody who was Destined to die, then that could certainly cause a kerfuffle. Unrelated, another fictional example of a story about destiny and how that works out is John Buchan's The Gap in the Curtain. It's about an ESP experiment in which six men succeed in getting a glimpse of a page of The Times (a different page for each person) for the same date one year in the future. The rest of the book tells the stories of what they do with the information, and how it doesn't necessarily go the way they were expecting.
__________________
Looking for online text-based game at a UK-feasible time, anything considered, Roll20 preferred. http://forums.sjgames.com/showthread.php?t=168443 Last edited by Inky; 10-21-2021 at 04:51 AM. |
10-21-2021, 05:19 AM | #28 |
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Rome, Italy
|
Re: Destiny: What would a world dominated by it look like?
It depends on how you intend "Destiny" as a GUPRS advantage but a society based on such concept may not be that far from our own.
IMHO a good example could be Classical Greece, where understanding and fulfilling Destiny was an integral part of the religious practices. Omens, Haruspices and Oracles had a major societal function covering everything from agricultural practices to state policy counselling. You are a farmer that tames a white stallion and suddenly all the town think you will be their great hero; you are a major politician that fumble the savoir faire check in front of the Oracle of Delphis and in few weeks you will destitute and your house in ruins. Or looking at a more modern times you can see how many catholic branches took a side turn in favor of the predestination, like the Calvinists (and i think it only got worse from there, like some contemporary evangelicals way too into the End of Times) I mean if everybody thinks Destiny is a thing, then there will be enough societal pressure to make Destiny self-fulfilling, without even the need of proper supernatural intervention.
__________________
“A strange game. The only winning move is not to play. How about a nice game of chess?” Last edited by Opellulo; 10-21-2021 at 05:23 AM. |
10-21-2021, 05:32 PM | #29 |
Join Date: Apr 2005
|
Re: Destiny: What would a world dominated by it look like?
Such a world would have a high level of fatalism and/or stoicism, especially among people with "non-positive" Destinies. Think of human societies where the notions of predestination or dharma are commonly accepted.
Such societies might also be incredibly callous by our standards. E.g., "We don't need to help these beggars because it is their fate to always be beggars." In some cases, however, universal Destinies could be used as early & easy "occupational testing." E.g., If destiny can be revealed in early childhood the parents of the kid with "Will become a great musician" destiny know to get them into music lessons. That would mean that most everyone knows their role in society, leading to more social stability and fewer cases of the Peter Principle or Dunning-Kruger Effect. It might mean slightly fewer wars. For example, the kid with the Destiny of "Will rule all Britain" gets adopted by the current king if he's not already the king's heir. If there are multiple kids with that destiny, the king adopts them all and sets up a power sharing agreement &/or firm line of succession. No revolution, civil war, or coup d'etat required. In any case, there will be professional fortune-tellers who can detect what a person's destiny will be. They might function like police or first responders to limit the harm that a person with a bad destiny will do (e.g., the cops in Minority Report), or as psychologists to help people with exceptionally good or bad destinies come to terms with their fate. |
10-22-2021, 11:27 AM | #30 |
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Hmm, looks like Earth, circa CE 2020+
|
Re: Destiny: What would a world dominated by it look like?
Personally, I think running a world where everyone has a Destiny and knows what it is would be very difficult to play out--unless you have only one or maybe two PCs, and neither they nor you (as GM) know the Destiny of the NPCs they interact with.
I frankly once found it very tricky making a Destiny known to a single player work out. The PC unquestionably died (I would have had to do some major, obvious, and perhaps even game-breaking changes to keep them alive). I had to twist things so that the wording of the Destiny was still valid even though it wasn't what was expected. I don't remember exactly what the Destiny was, but it was something like, "You'll die in the light of Barnard's Star." Well, they died during the daytime. So it, um, just happened that there was an inn very close named Bernard's Star Inn, and sunlight was shining through the star-shaped symbol on top of the inn....
__________________
GURPS Fantasy Folk: Elves My first GURPS supplement Top 12 Clues You're a Role-Playing Old-Timer My humorous (I hope) article that also promotes SJGames/GURPS Kerry Thornley: Dwarf Planet Eris, Discordianism, and The John F. Kennedy Assassination Without Thornley, there would never have been the Steve Jackson Games edition of Principia Discordia |
|
|