Steve Jackson Games - Site Navigation
Home General Info Follow Us Search Illuminator Store Forums What's New Other Games Ogre GURPS Munchkin Our Games: Home

Go Back   Steve Jackson Games Forums > Roleplaying > GURPS

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-18-2012, 12:38 PM   #21
kdtipa
 
kdtipa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Southern New Hampshire
Default Re: Taking Down the Big Monkey

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sunrunners_Fire View Post
[random]
Lets' assume the woman weighed no more than 200 lbs. To casually tote her about, she would need to be his BL or less. That means KK's ST was around 32. ST 32 means KK massed roughly 4,096 lbs. 4,096 lbs means KK is roughly 5.4 yards in height. 5.4 yards in height means KK is roughly SM+2.

I expected him to be taller!
That would just be the minimum for him to be able to pull it off. Not necessarily the definition of what his strength was.
kdtipa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2012, 12:40 PM   #22
Purple Haze
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Default Re: Taking Down the Big Monkey

Quote:
Originally Posted by marvin View Post
What was his height in the recent Peter Jackson Kong? I'd imagine that keeping him scaled consistently would be far easier when using computer animation.

Also, remember that a sniper rifle in the Pulp era is almost certainly going to be a .30 cal. (7.62mm) rifle. While the same sized round as those being shot by the biplanes (nearly all fighters in the WWI pre-WWII timeframe used .30 cal machine-guns as their primary weapons and this is true for the Curtiss Falcon biplanes depicted in King Kong (2005)), the rate of fire is obviously far less. Most large bore "elephant guns" were not as accurate at long range and there were no accuratized .50 cal rifles being produced that I know of. So taking Kong out at long range with what was essentially a civilian hunting rifle would be extremely difficult.

Benjamin
If it's PC's doing the sniping one would imagine they came suitably equiped.

Perhaps a Mauser T-Gewehr m1918 (13.2x92mm, 51.5 g @ 780 m/s).

Or (from 1937) a Boys .55 Rifle (47.6 g @ 884 m/s).

Or the old big game classic, some hand-made Holland & Holland in .600 Nitro Express (58 g @ 620 m/s).
Purple Haze is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2012, 12:41 PM   #23
Sunrunners_Fire
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Default Re: Taking Down the Big Monkey

Quote:
Originally Posted by kdtipa View Post
That would just be the minimum for him to be able to pull it off. Not necessarily the definition of what his strength was.
Hence my marking the post with the [random] tag. :grins:
Sunrunners_Fire is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2012, 12:42 PM   #24
Bruno
 
Bruno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Canada
Default Re: Taking Down the Big Monkey

Quote:
Originally Posted by kdtipa View Post
That would just be the minimum for him to be able to pull it off. Not necessarily the definition of what his strength was.
Yep. If he's ST 50 it's not going to make it harder for him to tote her. Sub-BL fractions matter for throwing, but unfortunately for benchmarking him we never got to see Kong try and toss Fay at an airplane :)

(Incidentally, if she was 200 lbs I'll buy a hat and eat it)
__________________
All about Size Modifier; Unified Hit Location Table
A Wiki for my F2F Group
A neglected GURPS blog
Bruno is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2012, 12:44 PM   #25
kdtipa
 
kdtipa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Southern New Hampshire
Default Re: Taking Down the Big Monkey

So... the wiki article is interesting and has this quote...

Quote:
Kong's size changes drastically throughout the course of the film. While creator Merian C. Cooper envisioned Kong as being "40 to 50 feet tall",[6] animator Willis O'Brien and his crew built the models and sets scaling Kong to be only 18 feet tall on Skull Island, and rescaled to be 24 feet tall in New York.[7] This did not stop Cooper from playing around with Kong's size as he directed the special effect sequences; by manipulating the sizes of the miniatures and the camera angles, he made Kong appear a lot larger than O'Brien wanted, even as large as 60 feet in some scenes.[8] Concurrently, the Kong bust made for the film was built in scale with a 40-foot ape,[9] while the full sized hand of Kong was built in scale with a 70 foot ape.[10] Meanwhile, RKO's promotional materials listed Kong's official height as 50 feet.[5]
So it sounds like the creator wanted it to be 50 feet, though as pointed out, it was inconsistent depending on the situation.
kdtipa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2012, 12:46 PM   #26
kdtipa
 
kdtipa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Southern New Hampshire
Default Re: Taking Down the Big Monkey

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bruno View Post
Yep. If he's ST 50 it's not going to make it harder for him to tote her. Sub-BL fractions matter for throwing, but unfortunately for benchmarking him we never got to see Kong try and toss Fay at an airplane :)

(Incidentally, if she was 200 lbs I'll buy a hat and eat it)
I'm at work in my cubicle and reading "unfortunately ... we never got to see Kong try and toss Fay at an airplane", and I had a really hard time not laughing out loud.
kdtipa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2012, 12:48 PM   #27
Anthony
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Berkeley, CA
Default Re: Taking Down the Big Monkey

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sunrunners_Fire View Post
ST 32 means KK massed roughly 4,096 lbs.
This is an error. The relationship between ST and weight in Basic is only (semi-)valid for mundane creatures made of mundane flesh and blood, which means it's meaningless for all giant monsters.
Anthony is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2012, 12:52 PM   #28
Sunrunners_Fire
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Default Re: Taking Down the Big Monkey

Quote:
Originally Posted by kdtipa View Post
So it sounds like the creator wanted it to be 50 feet, though as pointed out, it was inconsistent depending on the situation.
[random, but less random]
Well ...

50 feet is 16.6~ yards (and roughly SM+4). 16.6~ yards works out to 115,740 lbs. 115,740 lbs works out to ST 97 ... with a BL of 1,881.8, I imagine that KK would be toting the woman about with minimal effort. Heh.
Sunrunners_Fire is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2012, 12:52 PM   #29
RyanW
 
RyanW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Southeast NC
Default Re: Taking Down the Big Monkey

Quote:
Originally Posted by kdtipa View Post
So it sounds like the creator wanted it to be 50 feet, though as pointed out, it was inconsistent depending on the situation.
Sounds like his height depends more on who's doing the creating, rather than the needs of the plot.

In other words, he isn't as tall as the Enterprise is fast. He's as tall as Black Canary is strong and independent.
__________________
RyanW
- Actually one normal sized guy in three tiny trenchcoats.
RyanW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2012, 12:55 PM   #30
Refplace
 
Refplace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Yukon, OK
Default Re: Taking Down the Big Monkey

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stone Dog View Post
All I know is that there needs to be more threads worthy of the "reckless endangerment" tag.
LOL Yep.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Turhan's Bey Company View Post
It's a genre setting. He's plot feet tall.
Ouch.
Refplace is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
giant monkey, gorillas falling head, pulp heroes, reckless endangerment


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Fnords are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:32 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.