Quote:
Originally Posted by Rasna
Although being not that rare as metal element, lead was extracted in way lesser quantities than clay, so it was almost surely more expensive, and is was (it is) a serious toxic hazard for workers and smiths involved in its processing. Making a certain amount of lead glandes would likely require less time than making the same amount of clay slingshots because lead doesn't need to be dried for days and days under the Sun, and for some reason baked clay slingshots weren't that common.
|
Drying time isn't really relevant unless you need the 'stones' right away, and as they were made in very large numbers that doesn't seem like a huge problem as long as the area you're in has a season of consistent dry weather (and even if it doesn't, you can dry them under cover, it just takes longer).
Quote:
IMO, rectangular and roundish stone slingshots, pebbles and round clay ammo should have the base Damage, Accuracy and Range for the sling.
Unshaped stones and pebbles should be considered of Low Quality, but they have virtually no cost, being available almost everywhere.
Biconical and ovoid stone slingshots and clay slingshots should give +20% Range and +1 Accuracy.
Lead glandes should give +1 damage, +60% Range and +1 Accuracy. They are more expensive than biconical/ovoid stone and clay ammo of the same weight. Bronze glandes were also used, although very rarely: they were in use in Cyprus during the very end of the Late Bronze Age. They would have pretty much the same stats of lead glandes, but with a better resistance to both atmospherical and mechanical sollecitations (treat as HT 14) and having a much higher cost.
|
Aside from differing range adjustments, and the shaped stone/glandes being the default, this is what
Low-Tech does.