|
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Dallas, TX
|
That could be problematic for engines with the high-thrust and water remass options, which I can't see making a difference to the ram-rocket.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Yorkshire, UK
|
Quote:
If it seems wrong, then just use the base stats for the engine in air-ram mode, and ignore any water or high thrust options. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
|
Quote:
Realistically I suppose you should recompute the engine performance using whatever the composition of the air is as reaction mass, which for most atmospheres will give you a thrust increase just like going to water reaction mass. That would also increase the reaction mass use, but you don't care about that in an air ram. Except that the additional hardware needed to deliver it will depend on it, and hence the atmospheric composition, and how big a compressor pump you need will vary with atmospheric pressure. And of course it lowers you exhaust velocity, which since you are now operating with a fuel that's not moving with your vehicle matters has become a speed limit. And... You could make this quite a complex engineering challenge if you really wanted, but why?
__________________
-- MA Lloyd |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| spaceships, ultra-tech |
|
|