Why is Broad-Minded a Quirk?

[demonsbane]

Originally Posted by Phoenix_Dragon

You know... If someone were to think that there was only one possible way to read something, but then found out that everyone else apparantly read it differently, you'd think that person might consider the possibility that they were wrong...

Originally Posted by Bookman

However, if we all agree that what the trait should do is limit one's choices and not provide a benefit, doesn't that imply that the text *is* clear?

But tons of people can be wrong all together.

However I think Figleaf23 is the wrong one here and I agree that with such plethora of reasons given in so many posts in this thread, he could reconsiderate his posture with no dishonor. But after all he's trying to defend the Broad-Minded Quirk as an objective virtue providing benefits in a one-way manner, etc, for turning it into an odd sort of Perk. Hence his clash with the rules -and with reality.

Figleaf23 just isn't going to change his view on this.

[Gizensha]

Originally Posted by Bookman

I think even he admits that it is clear what the trait should do. However, if we all agree that what the trait should do is limit one's choices and not provide a benefit, doesn't that imply that the text *is* clear?

Though I think the slight debate on how Broad-Minded and to a lesser extent Xenophilia should limit, and to what quantity, going on in the background is quite interesting.

[sjard]

This thread has gone nowhere for close to a hundred posts. Closed.