|
|
|
#131 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2008
|
Unless modified, a PC is a baseline character with baseline levels of narrowmindedness, whatever they may be, as for example, whatever the rules assumed when they wrote 'strange looks rarely bother you'.
|
|
|
|
|
#132 |
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
#133 |
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
|
Baseline is zero. There are no secret implicit mental disadvantages.
__________________
I don't know any 3e, so there is no chance that I am talking about 3e rules by accident. |
|
|
|
|
#134 |
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
|
No, barring the existence of psych lims and quirks, the PC's personality is whatever the player says it is. Want to be anachronistically egalitarian in the 13th century? No prob. (Well apart from how the aristocrats and even the peasants will sometimes react.). You don't _need_ a quirk to act quirky and you don't need an OPH to act obnoxious, just as you don't need to have an enemy on your character sheet to have someone stalking you and trying to kill you.
|
|
|
|
|
#135 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
#136 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
#137 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
#138 |
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
|
Ok. Can you explain in some depth how this sentence follows what was quoted? It appears a complete non sequitur to me.A PC is not defined relative to setting norms, except for reaction-modifier traits which describe how others in the setting see them.
__________________
I don't know any 3e, so there is no chance that I am talking about 3e rules by accident. |
|
|
|
|
#139 | ||
|
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2008
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
#140 | |
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
|
Quote:
Um? Magery is relative to setting norms how, in what setting?
__________________
I don't know any 3e, so there is no chance that I am talking about 3e rules by accident. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| broad-minded, broadminded, perks, quirks |
|
|