|
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Oz
|
Actually, total life support is exactly the same per ship using the approach with a replicator or an "open space" garden/farm, regardless of the number of people or the length of the trip. It is only when using the habitat-enhancing approach that the burden is the same per person on all missions. And that is a rather inefficent approach, one that you would only take if the number of crew and passengers required on the trip were small compared to teh capacity of one habitat system.
__________________
Decay is inherent in all composite things. Nod head. Get treat. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: In the UFO
|
Quote:
__________________
Is love like the bittersweet taste of marmalade on burnt toast? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
"Gimme 18 minutes . . ."
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Albuquerque, NM
|
Perhaps with a TL modifier.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Oz
|
How do you feel about a number of persons supported per cabin at sufficiently high TLs?
__________________
Decay is inherent in all composite things. Nod head. Get treat. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
|
Quote:
As a troop ship she carried 15-16k men per run. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| houserules, life support, pulver responses, spaceships |
|
|