Steve Jackson Games - Site Navigation
Home General Info Follow Us Search Illuminator Store Forums What's New Other Games Ogre GURPS Munchkin Our Games: Home

Go Back   Steve Jackson Games Forums > Roleplaying > GURPS

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-26-2009, 07:27 PM   #1
Agemegos
 
Agemegos's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Oz
Default Re: [Spaceships] Total life support

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ulzgoroth View Post
Total life support weighs the exact same per person for all of these ships. Therefore, total life support is nothing like crates of dried oranges.
Actually, total life support is exactly the same per ship using the approach with a replicator or an "open space" garden/farm, regardless of the number of people or the length of the trip. It is only when using the habitat-enhancing approach that the burden is the same per person on all missions. And that is a rather inefficent approach, one that you would only take if the number of crew and passengers required on the trip were small compared to teh capacity of one habitat system.
__________________

Decay is inherent in all composite things.
Nod head. Get treat.
Agemegos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2009, 09:02 PM   #2
David L Pulver
AlienAbductee
 
David L Pulver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: In the UFO
Default Re: [Spaceships] Total life support

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brett View Post
Actually, total life support is exactly the same per ship using the approach with a replicator or an "open space" garden/farm, regardless of the number of people or the length of the trip. It is only when using the habitat-enhancing approach that the burden is the same per person on all missions. And that is a rather inefficent approach, one that you would only take if the number of crew and passengers required on the trip were small compared to teh capacity of one habitat system.
For more realism, assigning a number of persons supported per area that a open space provides would be better.
__________________
Is love like the bittersweet taste of marmalade on burnt toast?
David L Pulver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2009, 09:06 PM   #3
Crakkerjakk
"Gimme 18 minutes . . ."
 
Crakkerjakk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Default Re: [Spaceships] Total life support

Quote:
Originally Posted by David L Pulver View Post
For more realism, assigning a number of persons supported per area that a open space provides would be better.
Perhaps with a TL modifier.
__________________
My bare bones web page

Semper Fi
Crakkerjakk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2009, 09:21 PM   #4
Agemegos
 
Agemegos's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Oz
Default Re: [Spaceships] Total life support

Quote:
Originally Posted by David L Pulver View Post
For more realism, assigning a number of persons supported per area that a open space provides would be better.
How do you feel about a number of persons supported per cabin at sufficiently high TLs?
__________________

Decay is inherent in all composite things.
Nod head. Get treat.
Agemegos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2009, 05:48 AM   #5
The Colonel
 
The Colonel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Default Re: [Spaceships] Total life support

Quote:
Originally Posted by David L Pulver View Post
For more realism, assigning a number of persons supported per area that a open space provides would be better.
This is where our stacking limits return ... for example the RMS Queen Mary was designed for about 2k passengers by 1934 standards (~700 each first and second class and about 600 steerage) and a bit over a thousand crew.
As a troop ship she carried 15-16k men per run.
The Colonel is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
houserules, life support, pulver responses, spaceships


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Fnords are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:41 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.