Steve Jackson Games - Site Navigation
Home General Info Follow Us Search Illuminator Store Forums What's New Other Games Ogre GURPS Munchkin Our Games: Home

Go Back   Steve Jackson Games Forums > Roleplaying > GURPS

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-17-2008, 12:55 PM   #1
demonsbane
 
demonsbane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Spain —Europe
Default Re: So...GURPS D&D?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter Knutsen
Sure, but the two Dungeon Fantasy books don't replace Magic in any way, or even the pertient parts of Martial Arts.
The point of DF isn't to make you not buy Martial Arts, but remain open to that sourcebook if you want or need it for enhancing your GURPS game. In the same way DF, being GURPS + assumptions, remains open to other sourcebooks as Dragons, Fantasy or Thaumatology. Or any other.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter Knutsen
I'd much have preferred to see a version of GURPS Dungeon Fantasy that did away with spells, and handled everything with Advantages. Even if it meant that the core book would be 64 pages instead of 32 pages, and cost 40%-60% more. (...)
That would have made it possible to run Dungeon Fantasy campaigns without needing to own GURPS Magic or even needing to reference the few spells that are in the GURPS core books.
I see things differently. Some people seems desperate for throwing away Magic, thinking Powers completely render that approach old or useless. But the future Thaumatology is going to make use of Magic material, I think enhancing it.

So, DF using Magic material for some things and Powers for others isn't but coherent with the GURPS line as a whole.



Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter Knutsen
Oh, and by the way, where are the "racial" templates? And optional "racial" advantages? GURPS Dungeon Fantasy badly needs a splatbook.

(Also include "Bane"-type weapons in the splatbook. They're very much a part of the dungeon fantasy genre, and IIRC they exist in GURPS Magic as Enchantments already, so leaving them out of the DF core looks strange.)
I agree with this, and the answer will be (the next week I guess) DF 3.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter Knutsen
It really is a big mistake to not distinguish between historical supplements and rules distillations.
I agree about the differences between historical supplements and DF, but still DF isn't only a "mere" exercise of rules distillation. There are creativity, too.

I'm quite happy with the work of Sean here.

Cheers
__________________
"Let's face it: for some people, roleplaying is a serious challenge, a life-or-death struggle."
J. M. Caparula/Scott Haring

"Physics is basic but inessential."
Wolfgang Smith

My G+
demonsbane is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
conversion, d&d


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Fnords are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:28 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.