|
|
|
#1 | |
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Brescia, Italy
|
Did anybody make some sample spaceships? I'm particularly interested in military vessels, since I'm going to play a fight-heavy space campaign and I'm getting mad designing sample opponents. ;-)
Thanks for your attention and answers.
__________________
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Austin
|
Quote:
__________________
Paul Chapman |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Oz
|
Quote:
But I don't like waiting!
__________________
Decay is inherent in all composite things. Nod head. Get treat. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Wellington, NZ
|
Me, either.
__________________
Rupert Boleyn "A pessimist is an optimist with a sense of history." |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Manchester, UK
|
Quote:
If you want Traveller equivalent or Transhuman Space equivalent ships you will probably find them and I would guess some Star Trek and Star Wars ships may be out there too.
__________________
Always challenge the assumptions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | ||
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Brescia, Italy
|
Quote:
I made a couple of samples, just to give my players something to shoot at: Light Fighter SM: 5 Front [1] Armor: Nanocomposite [2!] Weapons: Medium Battery [3!] Weapons: Major Battery [core] Control Room Center [1] Armor: Nanocomposite [2] Power Plant: Fusion Rear [1] Armor: Nanocomposite [2-4] Fuel Tank [5-6] Reaction Engine: Antimatter [core] Reaction Engine: Antimatter The major battery is a missile launcher; the medium battery, three improved lasers. Missile Corvette SM: 6 Front [1] Armor: Nanocomposite [2!] Weapons: Major Battery [3!] Weapons: Medium Battery [4] Defensive Ecm [5] Array: Tactical [core] Control Room Center [1] Armor: Nanocomposite [2] Power Plant: Fusion [3-4] Fuel Tank Rear [1] Armor: Nanocomposite [2-3] Reaction Engine: Antimatter Both battieries are composed of missile launchers.
__________________
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | ||
|
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Manchester, UK
|
Quote:
Quote:
Nitpick: reaction drives can't be buried inside the ship [core]. For short duration fighters/craft you could go with non-superscience High-thrust Antimatter Thermal Rockets and the fuel is way cheaper. Antimatter catalyzed hydrogen is only $20K/ton rather than 12M$/ton for full antimatter engines. Or if your superscience allows: 1G HT Hydrogen / 1.5G Fusion Torch (water) drives and the fuel is practically free.
__________________
Always challenge the assumptions |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Brescia, Italy
|
Something like that, you mean:
SM: 5 Front [1-2] Armor: Nanocomposite [3] Defensive Ecm [4!] Weapons: Major Battery [5!] Weapons: Medium Battery [core] Control Room Center [1-2] Armor: Nanocomposite [3-4] Fuel Tank [5] Power Plant: Fusion Rear [1-2] Armor: Nanocomposite [3-4] Reaction Engine: Antimatter
__________________
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Oz
|
Quote:
__________________
Decay is inherent in all composite things. Nod head. Get treat. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | ||
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Brescia, Italy
|
Quote:
Remember, you can fire a single turret weapon per Gunnery task and you can do only a single Gunnery task per turn, so more than one weapon in turret would be a waste. And since the pilot would be at -4 to hit due to the two different kind of tasks he's performing (I'm assuming he wants to pilot the fighter too!), the +2 to hit for a beam weapon in a fixed mount would be welcome.
__________________
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|