[1980s] Background and Parent Unit for Female in 14 Co in the British Armed Forces

[Farmer]

Originally Posted by Icelander

Sure, but contrary to cinema, SIS and the Security Service were neither armed nor trained with firearms, for the most part.

Most intelligence gathering, undercover, counter-terrorism, and support roles don't need firearms. Their being seconded was for other purposes, not least of which being less suspected of being involved, but also potentially have significant skill set variations that might have been needed. It's factual that they were seconded, so there was clearly a considered need and benefit, particularly set against a general prohibition on women serving in many roles.