|
|
|
|
|
#1 | |||
|
Join Date: Dec 2021
Location: Indiana
|
Quote:
Quote:
Standing (engaged) would be DX12 with 1d damage. Standing (engaged) + Shrewd Blow would be adjDX7 with 2d damage. Charge would be DX12 with 2d damage. Charge + Shrewd Blow would be adjDX7 with 3d damage. Quote:
Last edited by Bill_in_IN; 04-18-2024 at 07:36 AM. |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Durham, NC
|
Quote:
The javelin figure charging + shrewd had adjDX of 7. Thus the javelin figure standing vs charge + shrewd would get adjDX of 9. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Join Date: Dec 2021
Location: Indiana
|
Quote:
I forgot about that pole weapon scenario. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Join Date: Jun 2019
|
When standing vs a charge, I'm having a little trouble accepting that the stationary defender with a pole weapon should be able to aim a shrewd thrust. It seems cinematically incorrect, especially if you picture the defender has braced their pole arm with the butt grounded. Shouldn't it be viewed more like, the attacker by charging in is aiming their body at the defender's spear-point, not the defender aiming their spear-point at a particular spot on the attacker?
__________________
"I'm not arguing. I'm just explaining why I'm right." |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: New England
|
Yes, the damage bonuses stack. But, the Shrewd Thrust DX penalty might make the Pole Weapon Expert’s attack occur after other polearm attacks, which could well mean that the attack is never made at all.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Join Date: Dec 2021
Location: Indiana
|
Great catch and Good point.
Last edited by Bill_in_IN; 04-18-2024 at 07:19 AM. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|