|
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Coquitlam B.C.
|
Quote:
Thank you for the fast reply. I don't think that I've got Cyclic wrong, on page B104 it says: Multiply the base value but the number of cycles past the first ... (My italics.) The first attack is standard cost, so three attacks is two extra, or times two. This is backed up by the example of a Poison Bite on page B114. Cycling with 5 attacks (4 extra), cost x4. *** Thinking about this, the rule does not make much sense, if we multiplied by the number of attacks, the first attack would cost x1, the second would cost x2, having 3 would cost x3, etc. Very sensible. But as written, a single extra attack (e.g. cycling 2) costs nothing extra, which seems a logical error. Warm regards, Rick. Last edited by Rick_Smith; 03-28-2024 at 05:05 PM. Reason: Added in example on page B114. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| afflictions, close combat, innate attacks, modified attacks, poison |
|
|