Avert timing question

Axly Suregrip · 03-10-2024, 08:52 PM

Or I like to think of turn 1 actions being consistent with turn 2+ actions. Your method treats the target creature inconsistently the first action phase while under the affects of Avert.

That is, for an engaged figure under this spell they are forced to disengage. No one that is engaged can move 2 hexes, so a engaged figure will always spend movement shifting 1 hex away unless already at the furthest hex and come action phase, they will disengage.

Side issue: I don't understand your situation 6. How is it the disengaged target moved their full movement and did no comply during movement to being under the affects of Avert? (Not important relevant to my point, just looked like a false scenario)

So, regarding engaged figures, my interpretation is the consistent way.

03-10-2024, 08:52 PM	#8
Axly Suregrip Join Date: Jun 2018 Location: Durham, NC	Re: Avert timing question Or I like to think of turn 1 actions being consistent with turn 2+ actions. Your method treats the target creature inconsistently the first action phase while under the affects of Avert. That is, for an engaged figure under this spell they are forced to disengage. No one that is engaged can move 2 hexes, so a engaged figure will always spend movement shifting 1 hex away unless already at the furthest hex and come action phase, they will disengage. Side issue: I don't understand your situation 6. How is it the disengaged target moved their full movement and did no comply during movement to being under the affects of Avert? (Not important relevant to my point, just looked like a false scenario) So, regarding engaged figures, my interpretation is the consistent way.