Quote:
Originally Posted by Bathawk
I figured -40% because a tank has the ability to attack with bullets (usually a -40% defensive limitation) and other forms of attacks (cannon, simply running a target over)...and while yes, a tank is probably less common on a WWII battlefield than infantry, if I KNOW I'm invulnerable to tank damage, and given the choice, I'm going to charge that Tiger tank instead of the pillbox of infantry...so it's probably not worth as much as say a -60% limitation
|
Note that on real battlefields tanks rather like to have infantry close by as support. Largely because tanks have bad stealth and bad perception and can readily be ambushed by anti-tank weapons if they don't have somebody around to spot the threat for them. (And in a defensive arrangement with pillboxes the tank would definitely tend to position behind the infantry positions, so unless you're a speedster or bulletproof charging it isn't going to go well.)