Steve Jackson Games - Site Navigation
Home General Info Follow Us Search Illuminator Store Forums What's New Other Games Ogre GURPS Munchkin Our Games: Home

Go Back   Steve Jackson Games Forums > Roleplaying > GURPS

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 08-26-2023, 10:57 PM   #19
Bathawk
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Default Re: In Gurps, how powerful do you need to fight a tank?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Otaku View Post
Maybe I'm just not getting it... but tanks seem both more and less common IRL than how Bathawk's statement reads. Well, that or my dubious understanding of GURPS is at work again, so I'm going to risk sharing my own take on this.

Unless we're in a setting where nearly all warfare is restricted to tanks, anything with "versus tanks" seems more niche than -40% indicates. I mean, even if you successfully keep it secret (Secret?) that your Damage Resistance only applies against attacks made by (or perhaps even from) tanks, you've got everything else on the battlefield to worry about. Or are tanks really that heavily present on the battlefield?

Okay, so what is the "more common" part? If we invert things, and your DR is against everything except tanks, once again you'll need to keep it secret (Secret?) because tanks aren't that far away in (for example) the United States of America. Well, in the American Midwest, anyway. We're not a war zone [insert sports joke here/], but there are a lot of military bases (outposts? Depots? Not sure what all to call them) here. I mean, most of them aren't the Army or Marines, but the Army Reserve or the National Guard... but that's enough for this to be a big issue. At least, once this gap in your defenses is known. Yeah, getting the tanks to where you (your tank-vulnerable character) are before you can flee is a nightmare, between getting authorization for the tanks and transporting them... but sooner or later, your character is probably getting shot by a tank. Barring an amazing dodge or other mitigating circumstances.
I figured -40% because a tank has the ability to attack with bullets (usually a -40% defensive limitation) and other forms of attacks (cannon, simply running a target over)...and while yes, a tank is probably less common on a WWII battlefield than infantry, if I KNOW I'm invulnerable to tank damage, and given the choice, I'm going to charge that Tiger tank instead of the pillbox of infantry...so it's probably not worth as much as say a -60% limitation
Bathawk is offline   Reply With Quote
 

Tags
combat, piat, supers, tank


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Fnords are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:23 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.