Quote:
Originally Posted by TippetsTX
TBH, restoring the 'classic' progression scheme is a great solution to the LE problem. It is an elegant, well-balanced and time-tested design. If you go that route, however, I would not recommend attempting to accommodate the LE feature of purchasing talents/spells directly with XP. Stick to the original IQ-increase dependency. It's much cleaner.
|
I concur that the Classic system is cleaner especially from an accounting perspective. There was only one thing on which XP could be spent, attribute points, and IQ was the limit on Talent points. But it was also why we had high IQs to accommodate multiple talents. The old joke was, "Conan the Librarian".
However, I do appreciate Legacy TFT's allowance for spending XP on talents. Although, I believe that 500 per IQ point is too expensive, it does get rid of the "Conan the Librarian" situation. If you capture the starting attributes, XP earned, XP spent, and starting list of talents, the accounting in Legacy works. I have set up such an accounting system for all of my PCs while I was learning the Legacy TFT system. I don't require it as a GM but I strongly encourage it because I don't want to be the bad guy later on when I default to the 'you should have tracked that better' stance when deciding which way to rule on something as a GM. I also try to GM as if I'm training new GMs. That way, I'm not seen as a guy with a God complex. Having players know the rules themselves can help to keep a GM honest and promote a higher level of participation.