The appeal, of course, would be to be able to use something much more efficient than normal rockets.
But most concept deep-space rockets likely wouldn't work in atmosphere anyway,
or have enough thrust to sustain flight.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fred Brackin
Yes, but the 1956 Karman line was calculated based on the capabilities of the Bell X-2. That had a thrust-to weight ratio of 3 to 5 fully loaded but better than 1 to 1 just before the fuel ran out.
We can do a little better than that today but not with a payload-carrying craft. The numbers are already far higher than the theoretical winged orbiters from Space 1e.
|
I'm not sure thrust to weight is actually relevant to the calculation at all, which (going from the wiki here) was about lift vs. heating.