|
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
Join Date: Aug 2018
|
Quote:
To help make sense of why B370's "with the usual penalty" of -4 not being halved, if it was actually half of a doubled thing. MA137 gives a -7 (exta -3) to strike at the joints of the hand, so maybe when you try to wrench a weapon away by targeting the hand holding the weapon, it's like grappling the hand's joints? Rounding to a higher penalty is supported on MA68 where it lists -3 (from -2.5 being half of -5) to grapple the face or neck, so -3.5 should become -4. MA68 we also see reiterated "Grabs for weapons are at -4." Given how weapons come in difference sizes it seems strange though, it's presumably easier to find somewhere to grab ahold of a bo staff than of a dagger. TG13 approaches this with "Grabbing the Foe" vs "Grabbing the Obect" The first (GTF) mentions "To move past a weapon and grab the wielder, you may step into close combat and attack the user’s hand at -4 (see Grabbing, p. B370), or his arm at -2." but like B370 doesn't explicitly remind us (not exclude) the usual "halve the penalty" guide. "Use the penalties given in Striking at Weapons (p. B400) instead of the generic -4 to hit the hand on p. B370" pretty well addresses the concern I had. The only thing it doesn't really cover is how maybe if a weapon is a character (being grabbed) being behind the partial cover of your wielder might perhaps make it harder to target. Like for example if it was held in a reverse grip, or you were on the opposite side of the hand wielding the weapon and trying to reach around the wielder to grab their weapon. I could see using no penalties if the weapon is "offered" (ie you're being attacked by it) but perhaps penalties if it's being held back defensively. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| grab, grappling, martial arts, rules question, technical grappling |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|