|
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#19 | |
|
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Luxembourg
|
I agree that the number in the OP are way too high.
Quote:
In such a system, a minor noble created baron of X would have his descendant several generation later still be Baron of X, even if they now own a third of the country and are the King most trusted advisor. And the reverse for the much respected but powerless Duke of Y, whose ruined family now only own a small manor house. *** Another possibility, pride in the ancestry. As a Rohan once said : "Roi ne puis, duc ne daigne, Rohan suis " "King I cannot, Duke i wont deign, I am Rohan" Although to be honest ... her son did accept the duke title :) In this case, you would have nobles that prefer the old and respected family title of baron/viscount rather than a newly created Duke with little history or respect. *** And yet another explanation, which iirc doesn't really fit Cardien but would make sense in some other places : there are only a few noble lines left, with many titles concentrated on one person. So, the patriarch carry the family Duke title, and his sons, grand-sons, brothers, nephews, .. split the dozens minor family title between them. If the old duke is really long-lived, you could have several younger family members on the council. |
|
|
|
|
| Tags |
| banestorm |
|
|