|
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
|
Quote:
I hope to see those re-written if there ever is a Gurps 5e. It would be so much clearer if the "default" version of any Power didn't have built-in defects and if your version does it would be because you put them there.
__________________
Fred Brackin |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | ||
|
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: South Dakota, USA
|
Compound Post as I don't want to double post. So I'm quoting and responding to two posts by two different people.
Quote:
Though I'm not sure if everything being discussed really counts as a "defect", as it were. Complications? Sure, but this is why I brought up Damage Resistance. How it interacts with Afflictions isn't so much a defect as a feature. The same if your (always on) DR is the sort that can prevent hypodermic needles from being used on you, or complicate surgery. It sounds bad when beneficial afflictions, injections, and procedures are on the docket, but can be a real lifesaver when an enemy has you otherwise helpless. Quote:
What I've been saying has at least partially been keeping pace with the larger discussion. So I'm also trying to wrap my head around Regeneration and surgery, Regeneration and foreign material in wounds, Regeneration and cybernetics (or even more mundane medical implants), etc.
__________________
My GURPS Fourth Edition library consists of Basic Set: Characters, Basic Set: Campaigns, Martial Arts, Powers, Powers: Enhanced Senses, Power-Ups 1: Imbuements, Power-Ups 2: Perks, Power-Ups 3: Talents, Power-Ups 4: Enhancements, Power-Ups 6: Quirks, Power-Ups 8: Limitations, Powers, Social Engineering, Supers, Template Toolkit 1: Characters, Template Toolkit 2: Races, one issue of Pyramid (3/83) a.k.a. Alternate GURPS IV, GURPS Classic Rogues, and GURPS Classic Warriors. Most of which was provided through the generosity of others. Thanks! :) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Join Date: Dec 2020
|
Quote:
When it's the advantage by itself, It literally doesn't. In fact it gives bonuses(!) to resist the exact situation OP presented, as it includes the rapid healing advantage! The GM would explicitly have to remove this advantage bundle from Regeneration for this scenario to play out without a critical failure (practically speaking, of course. You could have dumped your health when taking Regeneration!) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
|
Unmodified regeneration isn't that.
__________________
I don't know any 3e, so there is no chance that I am talking about 3e rules by accident. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Join Date: Dec 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| crippled leg, crippling, regeneration |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|