Replacement for Pyramid?

[Say, it isn't that bad!]

I know I saw somewhere around the internet, someone who had done a couple issues of an attempt at a free replacement for Pyramid.

Now I can't seem to find it in my links or history.

Anyway, anyone know of any such thing?

[Raekai]

Do you mean The Path of Cunning?

[Say, it isn't that bad!]

Originally Posted by Raekai

Do you mean The Path of Cunning?

Yes, thank you! :)

I would recommend adding "GURPS" to the page title, as it turns out I did have it bookmarked, but, also I should sort my bookmarks.

[Donny Brook]

Well, I've bookmarked that for future perusal. As with SJG it looks like they don't want amateur contributions though.

[johndallman]

Originally Posted by Donny Brook

Well, I've bookmarked that for future perusal. As with SJG it looks like they don't want amateur contributions though.

Oh, we do! We want them to be fairly good amateur contributions, but we are not demanding previous publication, or I would not really qualify (one Pyramid volume 2 article, about 20 years ago).

Incidentally, we're interested in articles that Pyramid did not buy, or which were returned when its publication ceased. We thought this was reasonably obvious, but since we haven't had any offers, I thought I should make it explicit.

[Donny Brook]

Originally Posted by johndallman

Oh, we do! We want them to be fairly good amateur contributions, but we are not demanding previous publication, or I would not really qualify (one Pyramid volume 2 article, about 20 years ago).

Incidentally, we're interested in articles that Pyramid did not buy, or which were returned when its publication ceased. We thought this was reasonably obvious, but since we haven't had any offers, I thought I should make it explicit.

Well, I should let you know then that the jargon in your style guide is a barrier, perhaps unintentional.

[Refplace]

Originally Posted by johndallman

Oh, we do! We want them to be fairly good amateur contributions, but we are not demanding previous publication, or I would not really qualify (one Pyramid volume 2 article, about 20 years ago).

Incidentally, we're interested in articles that Pyramid did not buy, or which were returned when its publication ceased. We thought this was reasonably obvious, but since we haven't had any offers, I thought I should make it explicit.

You reached out before so I got the impression that was the plan going forward. Ill see what I have

[johndallman]

Originally Posted by Donny Brook

Well, I should let you know then that the jargon in your style guide is a barrier, perhaps unintentional.

Definitely unintentional, and now revised. Critique welcome on the new version.