Atlantean sword argument

[MrValkyr]

The line editor's response makes no sense. The cards bad stuff is that an amount of items has to be lost in order to equal a certain coin amount. which means that to lose a sword that can't be lost as bad stuff is a proxy result no different than losing an item to death because you lost everything as a proxy result of a bad stuff. This precedence would also change multiple applications in the game. if there was a bad stuff or curse that requires you to change your board with another player you would argue that that item is safe from that change. if you had to give up 500 coins worth of items and you only had two items you would be forced to give away the item that didn't have the protection of bad stuff, what if you wanted to give the sword away and an opposing player would say no you have to give the other item away because that one is protected from bad stuff. This essentially creates a scenario where you don't have control of your items.

Even in death. if death is a result of bad stuff or a curse the item is protected by proxy. This example you lose the sword by proxy of having to lose a certain amount of gold. If death is a bad stuff and most rules clearly State you have to do something unless a card otherwise States you do not have to... Death was a bad stuff in my car for text me for bad stuff. The cards protection Trump's the result of the bad stuff. You cannot set a precedence like that.