Quote:
Originally Posted by Anthony
any pattern that's larger than your evasion radius and lacks identifiable gaps (such as hard cover you can duck behind) won't allow meaningful evasion
|
Uh, isn't a fire pattern that's larger than your evasion radius a rather unusual circumstance, and one where the incoming fire is generally going to be of low effectiveness?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Anthony
(note that if you can see incoming projectiles, evasion beyond a certain distance will be 100%. This is rarely an issue for bullets vs infantry, but can be a problem for archery and unguided artillery against targets with radar).
|
Are there real situations where a target with radar can dodge artillery, or just hypothetical ones? I can't think of anything I'd expect to be able to be targeted by artillery that could detect unguided artillery shells and then maneuver around them except
maybe small (and comparatively agile) ships. Aircraft in flight aren't targets for that kind of thing, and I didn't think most ground-based radars could pick up and run on a few seconds notice.