|
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Join Date: May 2015
|
Adding CP of multiple figures tends not to be a solid measure of power. One 40-point figure can take out three 24-point figures per turn with sweeping blows, for example, but the CP total of 3 24-point figures is 72.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Pacheco, California
|
Quote:
https://www.hcobb.com/tft/tftcalc.html
__________________
-HJC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Join Date: May 2015
|
Non-sequitur?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
|
I think he's using a different definition of "CP".
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Join Date: May 2015
|
That's not the issue. The issue is that it does not work to just add a point value like this (whichever unit is used) for multiple figures of different types and expect to get a meaningful comparison of combat ability.
It's bad enough trying to use such a formula to evaluate who's more dangerous one-on-one. As soon as you add multiple figures, all bets are off, and noting that some UC V character has a high rating is not relevant to that. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Carrboro, NC
|
Quote:
All that aside, it's a place to start, and the GM can easily fudge the upcoming encounters based on the current state of the party. It's also useful if you want to exchange foes for ones of similar prowess. Your mileage may vary, but I'm happy to at least have something reasonable, if not very precise. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|