|
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
|
I want to first warn you about mixing UT and HT. They are not very compatible. So when using an ammo type from UT you should use the UT rules for it and not try and retrofit anything from HT.
This esecially applies to mixing tank ammo and pistol ammo. APFSDSDU that was P+ would need a 10mm wide penetrator with a 10-to-1 aspect ration i.e the priojectile by itself would need to be 100mm long. That's not goign to fit in a .454 Casull cylinder. I believe that APEP gets the+1 per die, the (3) armor divisor and the P class downgrade. From a full length barrel that's probably 5D+5 P (3). That's what I think the rules say. Change the rules if you want to. Also note the LC. Such ammo would have to be sourced to someone unconcerned with Legality for one reason or another.Also that a relativley rare mid-TL8 ammo like .454 Casull with no known military users has to be getting this wide variety of potent ammo from some custom prducer. Probably it's one-of-a-kind.
__________________
Fred Brackin |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | ||||
|
Doctor of GURPS Ballistics
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Lakeville, MN
|
Quote:
Quote:
To get equivalent scaling, a .454" case would fire a 2.6mm projectile, which would need to be about 75mm long in order to have the same aspect ratio as the big tank cannon. The case of the .454 is 35mm long. Reducing the aspect ratio to 15:1 would bring it in line with the case length (overall length is 45mm, so it would fit OK). Quote:
Quote:
__________________
My blog:Gaming Ballistic, LLC My Store: Gaming Ballistic on Shopify My Patreon: Gaming Ballistic on Patreon |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Join Date: Nov 2015
|
Imagine my surprise when stumbling on this thread Nemesis! Lol. I'm the player that brought this up, mostly because the wording in the book (which just mentions apep getting a 3 divisor and being a "superior apds") seems weird. Not going to throw out my opinions on the suggestions (that's the gms call unless he asks what I think) but wanted to clear up some setting confusion since people keep bringing up how rare the shots would be.
The LC doesn't matter AS MUCH as normal due to the nature of the world. Im sure firing bullets that rip through armor or explode would get me in trouble some places, but probably only if I fire them in a town. As for the bullets not being made, civilization is coming back enough for people to be able to make a lot of the lower end UT ammo. Mission to acquire the supplies for it if need be not withstanding. They ARE going to be expensive though. All the tl9 and up stuff is. Lol But yeah, just wanted to put out some context while the gm is (I think) unable to reply. Thanks everyone for the suggestions! Looking forward to seeing what Nemesis decides. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |||
|
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: New Bedford, MA
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Either way I am going to go with this idea as turning it into an APHP round having them do listed piercing damage but with an armor divisor of (3). |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Join Date: Sep 2018
|
Not to ask the obvious but who in a post apoc setting is making these micro-scale APEP bullets? Unless there's some high industrial alliance in the world that likes mega-badass Cassul rounds it would me much cheaper to get power armor with twin .50 cal machineguns than one of those bullets.
He's not shooting tank rounds so the effect would be scaled down. I wouldn't expect the difference would be mechanically different than an jacketted round, maybe marginally better range. Even a big Cassul bullet isn't really big enough to make use of APEP. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: A crappy state called Illinois
|
Ah, so basiclly Fallout with the serial numbers filed off. Cool stuff.
Personally I've rewritten Ultra-Tech's ammunition rules to better line up with High-Tech since the rules in the former were written to line up with the generic rules presented in the Basic set rather then reality. For APEP I stat them as doing x1.7 base damage, AD(2), drop pi down a step if under 40mm, double range and CF +6. Basically they are as good as APFSDS-DU rounds without the incindery effect and toxic side effects. This fits reality a bit better: I save the AD(3) for TL 11^ hyper dense penetrators. Though to be perfectly honest given the level of tech needed to make bulk amorphous tungsten these rounds should be in very, very short supply and could cost twenty times as much or more. Though this is just my two cents.
__________________
GURB: Ultra-Tech Reloaded Normies: Man! The government is filled with liars and thieves! Me: Well yeah, here's what they're lying about, what they're stealing from you, and who's doing it. Normies: Rolls eyes Shut up conspiracy theorist Me: >.> |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| firearms, guns, ultra-tech |
|
|