Quote:
Originally Posted by Skarg
I think an illusion would be slowed by heavy undergrowth as if it were real, but if a real figure could push through, so could the illusion. After the illusion passed, though, the undergrowth would just show not signs of having been pushed through. No?
|
Then why can't they open (and close) doors? Where does one draw the line? (And part of my argument is that the RAW statement about "plants cannot be affected by illusions" -- because plants have IQ 0 or 1 -- implies "illusions cannot push plants aside".)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skarg
Otherwise, I would think that any surface that should show disturbance when an illusion passes over it (e.g. a puddle, or dust, grass or leaves or snow or almost anything but a hard clean surface) would not seem to react and so give away the illusion.
|
In most combat situations, it's unlikely someone would have the chance to notice things like that. More generally, I'd argue that "things giving away the illusion" is simply part of the limitations of illusions. They're not capable of being perfectly believable under all circumstances.
You could, I suppose, argue that that kind of "visual chrome" would be akin to the illusory cuts and holes in armor and clothing produced by an illusion's attack (though one could argue the latter is produced partly by the mind of the victim, so puddles and dust can't produce ancillary illusions).