Damage Rolls with a Minus Modifier: Minimum 0 or 1?

[JLV]

Originally Posted by Rick_Smith

I didn't post my weapon's table because it is too big and complicated for the new TFT, I can not imagine that Steve would consider it. I've tried hard not to clutter up this forum with impossible suggestions.

Thanks for the link -- plenty of food for thought there, but I definitely see what you mean.

I had envisioned your table as simply being the existing weapons table with the damages modified to take into account piercing/cutting/crushing damage for the existing weapons. I didn't realize how enormously you had expanded it.

Again, thanks for sharing.

In principle, I still think the idea has great merit, and if such a revised table (simply replacing existing damages with ones revised to reflect the nature of the weapon itself, rather than a simple mathematical progression of damage types), I think it would be an excellent way of demonstrating those differences without otherwise affecting any other rule.