|
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Coquitlam B.C.
|
Quote:
I would opt for the lower priced one for two reasons. -- It is cheaper for me. -- It is cheaper for new players who might try out TFT, but are not yet fans. Warm regard, Rick. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Berkshire - UK
|
Quote:
I'm on a very tight budget, and at the moment may not even be able to dip into my pocket when the game is launched - (which is one of the reasons I want to do as much as I can to promote it in other ways.) and like Rick says - For newcomers that are not familiar with it, they may be reluctant to drop a large wedge of money on something they don't know about. Those of us that already have the old books and games are likely buying in more to show support, than actually needing to replace old stuff. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: New England
|
I'd pay more if the aesthetic and utilitarian quality of the product warranted a higher price.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Arizona
|
I think SJGs has done exactly the right thing -- $60 is much more likely to attract new gamers than something like the new Masks of Nyarlathotep at $139 or CoC 7th rules at $169.
Besides, if it does well, then plenty of new stuff will start rolling down the production pipeline, and we'll all have opportunities to pay lots for all the new goodies! ;-) (And frankly, who am I kidding? I budgeted $250 for this originally, and I strongly suspect that if I can buy multiple copies of both the Legacy Edition AND Melee and Wizard stand alone copies, I'll spend every penny of it doing so -- it's a great (and cheap) way to get more gamers involved!) |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Columbia, Maryland
|
Sixty will fit in my budget, but I have seen people on Facebook say "I hope I can afford this."
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Join Date: May 2015
|
A low entry point seems wise.
So does offering nice but also-affordable components (counters, maps) that can be used for both TFT & GURPS. Those could also act like publicity items since if people see games (and Internet postings of pictures of games) with cool battles with physically laid out with affordable but nice-looking cardboard counters no one had to paint by hand, and discussion of how the battle situation was an interesting game unto itself, not a hitpoint-countdown, that could draw people in. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Join Date: Mar 2018
|
Genius idea yet again Skarg!
Which reminds me, [HOWITZER] Does anyone know of quality hex map components, like the paper megahex parts in ITL, but cardboard, plastic, or similar? The best flat counters I can find, for quality cardstock and art, are in the Dark City Games. Anyone know other pre-printed cardstock flat counters? [/HOWITZER] |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Join Date: Dec 2017
|
I like the $60 price point. It keeps production cost down which means SJ more likely to be able to fund the kickstarter and allows me too buy multiple copies right off the bat. I want a copy of each for collection purposes and multiple copies for gifts and play. If SJ wants to put out a collectors edition later on I'm cool with that...probably buy that too.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|