Steve Jackson Games - Site Navigation
Home General Info Follow Us Search Illuminator Store Forums What's New Other Games Ogre GURPS Munchkin Our Games: Home

Go Back   Steve Jackson Games Forums > Roleplaying > The Fantasy Trip

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-12-2018, 09:24 AM   #1
Terquem
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Idaho Falls
Default Terminology Codification of Rules Concepts

Terminology Codification of Rules Concepts

I become rather particular when I write my own rules (or rewrite rules of games I like to fit my own quirks and foibles)

One of the things I rely on (again this works for me, I’m not saying it works for everyone, or should work for everyone) is a system of codification where terms that are used repeatedly are defined in the rules (usually in an appendix)

In Melee and Wizard the Options (a defined term) available for a Unit (Figure, as defined in the rules) are derived from determining the “State” of the Unit at the time that it is its turn to move. These States are Disengaged, Engaged, and InHTH

But this word, “States,” is my word, and is not codified in the rules that I can see

Does anyone have a better term, something that can be codified, for the “States” a figure is in when determining Options?
Terquem is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2018, 11:33 AM   #2
ecz
 
ecz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Default Re: Terminology Codification of Rules Concepts

Quote:
Originally Posted by Terquem View Post
Terminology Codification of Rules Concepts

I become rather particular when I write my own rules (or rewrite rules of games I like to fit my own quirks and foibles)

One of the things I rely on (again this works for me, I’m not saying it works for everyone, or should work for everyone) is a system of codification where terms that are used repeatedly are defined in the rules (usually in an appendix)

In Melee and Wizard the Options (a defined term) available for a Unit (Figure, as defined in the rules) are derived from determining the “State” of the Unit at the time that it is its turn to move. These States are Disengaged, Engaged, and InHTH

But this word, “States,” is my word, and is not codified in the rules that I can see

Does anyone have a better term, something that can be codified, for the “States” a figure is in when determining Options?
Stance?

but it's funny if an Italian have to suggest an English word to an American...
__________________
VASLeague Tournament Director
www.vasleague.org
ecz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2018, 06:21 PM   #3
Jim Kane
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Default Re: Terminology Codification of Rules Concepts

Quote:
Originally Posted by Terquem View Post
Terminology Codification of Rules Concepts

I become rather particular when I write my own rules (or rewrite rules of games I like to fit my own quirks and foibles)

One of the things I rely on (again this works for me, I’m not saying it works for everyone, or should work for everyone) is a system of codification where terms that are used repeatedly are defined in the rules (usually in an appendix)

In Melee and Wizard the Options (a defined term) available for a Unit (Figure, as defined in the rules) are derived from determining the “State” of the Unit at the time that it is its turn to move. These States are Disengaged, Engaged, and InHTH

But this word, “States,” is my word, and is not codified in the rules that I can see

Does anyone have a better term, something that can be codified, for the “States” a figure is in when determining Options?
"state", or it's common variation: "status", sound just fine to me.

JK
Jim Kane is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Fnords are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:39 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.