|
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Join Date: Jul 2015
|
It is still a throwing axe, no matter if its get a custom job right?
either way, if we look at helbarts and the like, they have multiple attacks modes, all benefitting from weapon master.... i wonder if this case is simular? |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Join Date: Aug 2004
|
Quote:
Weapon Master (Axes) [30] would apply to both, however. So. Weapon Master (Unnatural Pollaxe) [20] applies to every damn thing on that pollaxe, however ridiculous, but doesn't help one bit with a normal pollaxe. Even though everything on a normal pollaxe is subsumed in the unnatural one. Many GMs are at least a little lenient on this however.
__________________
My GURPS stuff |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Snoopy's basement
|
I say its still the same weapon.
If you didn't put the hammerhead on the back of the it, but you hit with the back of it anyway isn't it still the same weapon? If you do a pommel strike with the butt of the handle, isn't it still the same weapon? |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
|
I'd draw the line for single weapon at does it change any of the weapon's statistics? Yes? Not the same weapon.
One key test is probably Weapon Master (thrusting broadsword). If this is different from Weapon Master (broadsword), well, sharpening the point is about the minimum possible change you could make to a weapon. If that's enough to change categories then there's no way adding anything extra does not.
__________________
-- MA Lloyd |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Join Date: Jul 2015
|
okay, thanks for all the answers
did not try to provoke anyone, just hoped it covered. Will have a talk with my GM and let him see our discusion, så he can make a fair ruling. however, shold anyone have more to say on the matter, I would love to hear it. and if either Krum or Pullover have anything to add, please o please do! |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| modified weapons, weapon master |
|
|