|
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#8 | |
|
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Denver, Colorado
|
Quote:
I'd go with most of this. The low axial tilt seems obvious, as does high nitrogen content of the soil. There's a lot to be said for properly twisted amino acids, because that means humans can eat the native plants and animals, even though it means the native animals and pathogens can also eat us. I don't think low-salinity oceans is a viable expectation, but a better distribution of ocean and land would be nice. A dozen or so land-masses the size of Australia, distributed more or less evenly around the planet, might work out well, especially if they were connected with archipelagos. That means a lot of shallow waters teeming with life, and the lack of really huge expanses of open ocean minimizes the intensity of coriolis storms. I hadn't thought of the vulcanism thing, but that makes sense, too. Also, I'd say no huge extremes in altitudes. No mountains larger than about the Appalachians or the Pyrenees, which result in minimal rain-shadows or other atmospheric weirdness. Lots of flora and fauna, everywhere.
__________________
-- MXLP:9 [JD=1, DK=1, DM-M=1, M(FAW)=1, SS=2, Nym=1 (nose coffee), sj=1 (nose cocoa), Maz=1] "Some days, I just don't know what to think." -Daryl Dixon. |
|
|
|
|
| Tags |
| agriculture, ecology, ecosystem, gaia, habitability, space |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|