|
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Join Date: May 2015
|
I must have gotten something very wrong in the math. It was going to have the population cap at under 200 million for a planet that was over 5000 miles in diameter. At tl 10. That just seems... Questionable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Join Date: Aug 2008
|
We need your numbers. What is the world's affinity, diameter, and TL?
__________________
Buy My Stuff! Free Stuff: Dungeon Action! Totem Spirits My Blog: Above the Flatline. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Join Date: May 2015
|
I had actually already gotten rid of them. But... roughly 0.5 diameter, 7 affinity, TL 10, 50% ocean coverage... Aaah. I can't remember most of the other attributes but I plan to start over tomorrow. First thing is I'm going to make that World sheet fillable instead of making ugly text files.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
|
If your affinity is 7 then the base would be 130 million times 20 million or 2.6 billion. After applying the diameter modifier it should have been about 1.2 billion with a 5.000 mile diameter. 5,000 miles isn't .5.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Join Date: Jan 2011
|
I wanted to shamelessly plug my Starsystem generator which takes care of all the fiddly maths for you:
http://ultima.vsos.ethz.ch/starsystem-gen/ With the source here: https://github.com/tschoppi/starsystem-gen/ However, it seems that something broke on the server, which I'll have to fix tonight. Last edited by Myrion; 08-27-2016 at 03:36 AM. Reason: Set up my server with a prettier URL |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Join Date: May 2015
|
Okay then I was right on track up until 130 million then. I broke down at the squaring the planets diameter(in earth diameters). I'm very bad with math. And from the wording I couldn't see how the instructions weren't going to make the number smaller not larger.
And it seems like I screwed up at the diameter too. Which I did find kind of confusing but I had though I managed to muddle my way through. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Lawrence, KS
|
Quote:
Suppose, on the other hand, that the planet had 1.5x Earth's diameter. That's 2.25x the area. That would give you 5.825 billion. Having a lot more people on a bigger planet seems right, yes? But if a bigger planet has more a smaller planet should have fewer.
__________________
Bill Stoddard I don't think we're in Oz any more. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Join Date: Oct 2008
|
Quote:
Allow giving of the random number seed on the starsystem level(The first page) and if given pass on always the same random numbers based on it to the one or more planetary systems generated and use them as random number seeds on those. Thus the same seed would always generate the same resulting system. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: near London, UK
|
Quote:
The thing I would really like to be able to do is enter star parameters. Specifically spectral class and luminance, because those are the numbers I mostly have for real-world stars, and the others can largely be derived from them. (While I'm waiting for Jon Zeigler's new system to be ready…)
__________________
Podcast: Improvised Radio Theatre - With Dice Gaming stuff here: Tekeli-li! Blog; Webcomic Laager and Limehouse Buy things by me on Warehouse 23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Join Date: May 2015
|
Hey Myrion I don't suppose you know anyone who tossed together a nifty Species generator too, eh? lol
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| space |
|
|