|
|
|
#14 |
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Silicon Valley, California
|
I think that comment #13 was on the right track.
Rather than measure level of implausibility via physics, measure level of published support. For example, remote viewing (as measured by Targ et al at SRI) got some papers published in "real" journals, so that would be quite plausible. You could easily rate Psionics based on how many papers were published in how main-stream a journal. Let me add an expansion: that stuff published is science journals is most plausible, stuff published in the New York Times is next most plausible, regular newspapers less plausible, and the national enquirer least plausible. And roll from there..... Joshua Levy Last edited by joshualevy; 03-07-2016 at 10:04 PM. |
|
|
|
| Tags |
| psionic powers |
|
|