|
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Join Date: Oct 2008
|
The thing is, against the Japanese the tactic worked because of the lack of radar. Around the Mediterranean where the OP is placing things the probability of eventually being too close to some place with air defense radar is high and then night will not help that much.
It should also be noted that the Germans had on average more anti-air capability included in their ground forces than the Japanese. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Wormtooth Nation
|
Quote:
__________________
"Guys, I think maybe this whole time we've been the villains." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Join Date: Oct 2008
|
Quote:
Basically there were radars in 1937, but they were experimental beasts with a lot of downtime and low coverage. They also existed only in few places. A late WWII era radar can detect things quite well at mast height as long as you are not behind horizon, but the early air warning radars could generally not. As example the radar chain covering the channel in 1940 for the Battle of Britain could not detect thing really low. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: MO, U.S.A.
|
Yeah, the FW-190 threw me as well, since it was a post Battle of Britain aircraft. Quick look up, August 1941.
__________________
Xenophilia is Dr. Who. Plus Lecherous is Jack Harkness.- Anaraxes |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: The Land of Enchantment
|
Quote:
Are you're characters US military? If not, how about a surplus P2Y or F5L, or one of the PN aircraft instead? I tend to favor a surplus F5L for "totally not Call of Cthulhu" campaigns. Chaosium's Secrets of the Congo includes some information on the license-built Curtiss models. And the Grumman Goose is, of course, awesome as well. But it was just in prototype in 1937.
__________________
I'd need to get a grant and go shoot a thousand goats to figure it out. Last edited by acrosome; 05-30-2018 at 09:49 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: near Houston
|
Several commercial land-based planes were fitted with twin floats at some point: Beechcraft Model 18, Ford Tri-Motor, de Havilland Dragon Rapide and Lockheed Vega. All but the Beech 18 were flying before 1937.
__________________
A generous and sadistic GM, Brandon Cope GURPS 3e stuff: http://copeab.tripod.com Last edited by copeab; 05-31-2018 at 05:01 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Bristol
|
I always liked the look of the PBY. It was quirky and yet functional.
The Germans made an equivalent: Dornier_Do_24 The armament is a bit beefier. As for an aircraft for a group of PCs to use it is ideal (both of them). Other useful aircraft that could be met on patrols could be: Bristol Beaufighter de Havilland Mosquito Lockheed P-38 Lightning Petlyakov Pe-2 Creating a platform for too many guns could be: Lisunov Li-2 Douglas DC-3 Douglas C-47 Skytrain Of course these would be anachronistic versions of a Douglas AC-47 Spooky (aka Puff the Magic Dragon). Ideally you would want an aircraft which is simple like the PBY and or has many operators so that raiding for spares can be made easy. Main or front line aircraft would be required for duty and maybe these 'work horses' could be excused for other duties. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Wellington, NZ
|
You left out the Short Sunderland. Like a Catalina, but bigger.
__________________
Rupert Boleyn "A pessimist is an optimist with a sense of history." |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Bristol
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| airplane, catalina, tl6, vehicle, wwii |
|
|