|
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: London, UK
|
II can see the possibility of one piece models being produced by 3-D type printers in near future . Click on BBC News 24 showed new 3-D printer innovations at a technology show : using two materials - one of which is washed away at end of process - 'impossible' designs can be created . On this scale 'one piece' models with rolling wheels , movable guns , revolving turrets , opening doors & even retractable wheel guards are all achievable .
While I enjoy modelling , as it's been stated , on smaller scales can be an absolute nightmare on fiddly parts ! From long experience with Battle Fleet Gothic ship's rams , antennae and adornments ; it's far easier to start with one item and to add/modify it , than to start with multiple small parts & 'hope' you get them 95%+ okay and/or in right place ... The latter is what lead to the notorious 'humpbacked' look of a vast majority of Vengeance types of Grand Cruiser models in BFG . Many bought on eBay have to have all the glue dissolved off the metal & rebuilt by pinning , before the even start to look right ...
__________________
Five Gauss Guns on a Camper !!! The Resident Brit . Last edited by Racer; 01-25-2016 at 02:46 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Join Date: Nov 2013
|
Quote:
Outside of making a master, or prototypes I don't really see how using a 3-D printer to produce mini's would be better for a company than using traditional mold techniques. I might just not be seeing it myself, but the only case I see a production run being 3-D printed is if the run is so small that the molds would cost more than they would make off the minis. Though considering the cost of plastic injection molds I could maybe see that being an option). One issue is the amount of time it would take to produce each batch of minis. The casting route will likely have more setup time especially if we're assuming the 3-D printers are in house, but I still don't see how a printer would beat them on time compared to any of the usual casting materials, resin, pewter, or plastic even this would likely have the longest setup time due to needing the specially milled molds, but once you have them you can produce a high volume quickly. Another big issue would be cost vs. quality. If we're talking about extrusion printing then while the cost in material probably wouldn't be bad I don't think the detail they give without extra work after the print is there yet. Also in my experience at least they can be very finicky. Which would mean even with someone babysitting the machines you would probably end up with a lot of wasted time and plastic. If the plan is the laser sintering then the detail isn't your issue, but the time still is, and the cost is definitely. The machines themselves tend to be on the expensive side, and from my experience the material isn't exactly cheap either. Not to keep harping, but I wonder if the moving parts would be a good idea. Not so much on the turrets since a magnet and a pin vise can get you that on current minis. The wheels might be cool, but if you're using a system that uses bases then you lose that plus, and a bumped table would become a terrible thing if the minis could roll freely. Getting them to stay on slopes would be an even bigger pain. The door and wheel guards just scream easily chipped paint to me. It would also make the mini more fragile, fiddly, and a pain to paint. It's my personal experience, but some stickytack to hold the part in place and some CA accelerator to speed up drying time take a lot of the fiddlyness out of assembly, and most of my experience comes from putting together the 6mm Battletech minis which can get very fiddly at times. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Philadelphia Area
|
It would be like a dream to punch up a design for your next duel and then print out a miniature for it.
But my experience with a consumer-type 3D printer is that you have to make the weapons obscenely large relative to the vehicle scale (even for 3x cars) to not just chip off with the slightest abuse. Until the state of the art advances somewhat, this probably means home-printed miniatures need to stay kind of abstract instead of accurately reflecting the outward appearance of a given design. That is, even if you can front-mount 3 FTs or 6 MGs in the game, or slip a MD and FOJ under the back bumper together, it would be mighty tricky to home-print a model of those kind of things which is both visually sane and reasonably sturdy. Anyway, back to the original topic, I understand that the miniatures from the kickstarter in the original post are or are going on sale to non-backers too... |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Oakland, CA, USA
|
So, forgive my ignorance here, but I didn't know that 2x was under consideration for 6E.
How solid is that, and what other scales are they considering? |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Twin Cities, MN
|
2X CWC scale was the chosen size in the polls of yesteryear. (You can see the summaries on the Poll Scoreboard.)
Given the simplicity of the "design system" that they're shown so far, I doubt per-design custom miniatures would be worthwhile for CW6. Given the throw-away nature of CWC 2.5 vehicles, I don't see them being that useful there either. All you need is a set of decently representative and distinct vehicles, whether or not they have weapons or are close to the vehicle in use.
__________________
Last edited by Parody; 02-20-2016 at 01:49 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Snohomish, WA
|
__________________
Dynamax Designs, Designing quality since 2035. Watch your handling and remember to Drive Offensively! |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Spinward Marches
|
Just curious, what are the chances of SJ Games coming out with a line of CW minis?
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| miniatures |
|
|