|
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: One Mile Up
|
More importantly, if we're doing some variation on Firefly here, Chinese stuff is everywhere in the series (except the ethnicities of the main cast), while Japanese stuff is nowhere to be seen.
If this is supposed to be steampunkish, I'd personally dispense with TL7 trappings entirely, use some kind of TL 6+2 handwavium to achieve escape velocity, and then just use steam-based propulsion for maneuvering in vacuum. Whichever PC is the "Big Guy" can have the official job title of Coal Shoveler on a spaceship. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Join Date: Mar 2012
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: UK
|
Don't forget Russia! Armored Bears!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Join Date: Mar 2013
|
The comparison to Firefly is more to do with the nature of the 'Verse then anything. As for China, they weren't a Great Power
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
|
Quote:
Lower gravity on the world launching the thing will only go so far. That probably has less effect on the Delta-V required than you might hope for. One the other end, a breathable atmosphere and higher than lunar gravity does seriously mess with the design of what you're replacing the Lunar module with. I'd say almost be definition technology that enabled colonization in this scenario would have to be TL9 if there's no superscience involved. So you want superscience. The Skylark of Space is probably the most accessible source of in-period technobabble but there were other stories of Emergent Superscience from the TL6. Verne might just miss the right dates but H.G. Wells is in the first third of it. Edgar Rice Burroughs was just a little later.
__________________
Fred Brackin |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Join Date: Mar 2013
|
I've built surface to orbit spaceplane, 23.2 tons cargo, 64.5 tons Hydrogran-Oxygen fuel, $51,600 to refuel, interface rates of $2,224.137931 per ton, or under $1.20 per pound, or $2.40 after putting in a generous allowance for other costs, very cheap. Trans-Lunar shipping costs are probably about the same, so a shipper being charged $5 per pound and charging $10 per pound is probably the prices for moving goods
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
|
Quote:
So no safe landing an no take-off afterwards.
__________________
Fred Brackin |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Join Date: Mar 2013
|
Swap out one of the cargo holds for a soft landing system? But the point I'm aiming for will probably be 50 years AFTER the establishment of the first trans-lunar colony, making it a moot issue for the most part
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
|
<shrug> Okay, we won't look at the rocket engineer behind the curtain. I just wanted to point out that you didn't really have viable colonization ability at a hard science TL7.
__________________
Fred Brackin |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Meifumado
|
I don't know how far you've progressed with history or anything, but this is what I might do with the idea.
I'd have conjunctions, perhaps with the help of an uninhabitable intermediary moon, that make transfer between the inhabited moon and one of the other moons easier, but only occurring every few decades. This allows for the occasional wave of lower tech colonisation events to have happened in the past, by the setting's mad scientists, religious cults, or now-defunct superpowers (think of Portugal today). The setting's modern tech allows freer transport between the worlds and so they are just coming to grips with the secret settlements and power bases that were established decades or even centuries ago.
__________________
Collaborative Settings: Cyberpunk: Duopoly Nation Space Opera: Behind the King's Eclipse And heaps of forum collabs, 30+ and counting! |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| space |
|
|