[TS] Slicing the pie, a question?

[vicky_molokh]

Originally Posted by Langy

What prevents Waiting and Attacking at the same time is that those are two separate maneuvers. Step and Wait aren't separate Maneuvers. They're something that can be done at the same time - just like you can Attack and Step at the same time, not having to Step prior to the attack or after it.

You can either Step then Attack or Attack then Step, actually. The same should apply to Waits: either it's Step then Wait, or it's Wait then (in case a condition triggers) Step (and do whatever else is allowed).

Originally Posted by Langy

Also: Why do you think that A should automatically have priority in that situation? Making it a contest actually seems to make some sense as opposed to always prioritizing the person who gives up the initiative.

Because A gave up (lowercase) initiative and a Step in exchange for getting to interrupt B when B comes into range. While B now manages to retain all of {initiative, a Step, a right 'interrupt' A}.