Steve Jackson Games - Site Navigation
Home General Info Follow Us Search Illuminator Store Forums What's New Other Games Ogre GURPS Munchkin Our Games: Home

Go Back   Steve Jackson Games Forums > Roleplaying > GURPS

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 10-09-2014, 04:42 PM   #11
Kromm
GURPS Line Editor
 
Kromm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Montréal, Québec
Default Re: Dungeon Fantasy and Sword&Sorcery

Classic S&S has two things that define it as a distinctive subset of fantasy:

1. Swords. This doesn't mean the weapons called "swords," but rather swords as a symbol of personal combat, which in turn represents personal action in general. Tales may well have the window dressing of empires and kings and politics, but the focus of the events – what the protagonists actually go out and do – is burglary, carousing, fighting, stalking, surviving, etc. in person. In many of the classics, the heroes will achieve something impressive in the name of some cause, only to see that forgotten in the very next story, because they apparently spent/lost all the money and burned all their bridges. So it's back to climbing up more towers, slaying more foes, stealing more jewels, drinking more ale . . . Epic events function as scenery, in the spirit of, say, Odysseus (sure, there were great wars going on and he was a man of social import, but the stories are about him fighting and tricking individual foes, and personally surviving scary situations).

2. Sorcery. This doesn't mean Fireball spells and magic swords in the hands of the heroes. Rather, it means evil human sorcerers, sinister and supernatural nonhumans, and horrific monsters with magical powers. It nearly always symbolizes the opposition, not resources wielded by the protagonists. If the heroes even have magic, it's minor, unreliable, and/or a source of more trouble than good. Consider the Gray Mouser, who was formerly the apprentice of a wizard, but whose magical powers are rarely helpful, and who currently has Sheelba of the Eyeless Face as a patron, which mostly means weirdness and annoying errands.

As far as DF goes, it's ideal for the Swords part. It already casts out politics and kings and empires to focus on heroic individual actions, and is already essentially episodic, with the heroes constantly questing after new treasures because apparently, the last bunch wasn't enough. It's a little forced for the Sorcery part, as it tends to make magic-working worthwhile as a primary profession and put magic items, nonhumans, and so on into the realm of the heroes rather than unpleasant NPCs.

To use DF for S&S, narrow the starting professions down to assassin, barbarian, innkeeper, knight, martial artist, scout, swashbuckler, thief, and maybe holy warrior and ninja. If someone wants to be a "wizard," point the player at the scholar or ask them to sacrifice 50 points from their primary template to buy the <whatever>-wizard lens. All PCs have to be human. Nonhumans and dedicated spellcasters are NPCs, usually unfriendly, and often evil . . . but you can still get your money's worth from the supplements for them, because you'll need enemies. All of the monsters and most of the rules for game play (hiking, sneaking, traps, etc.) work "as is." Finally, nobody can start with magic items, and there will be little to no magical treasure.
__________________
Sean "Dr. Kromm" Punch <kromm@sjgames.com>
GURPS Line Editor, Steve Jackson Games
My DreamWidth [Just GURPS News]
Kromm is offline   Reply With Quote
 

Tags
dungeon fantasy

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Fnords are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:25 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.