Steve Jackson Games - Site Navigation
Home General Info Follow Us Search Illuminator Store Forums What's New Other Games Ogre GURPS Munchkin Our Games: Home

Go Back   Steve Jackson Games Forums > Roleplaying > GURPS

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-14-2014, 09:41 AM   #1
Mailanka
 
Mailanka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Eindhoven, the Netherlands
Default Re: [Spaceships]Piercing And Other Damage Types

Quote:
Originally Posted by vierasmarius View Post
Using (non-nuclear) explosives in space projectiles is generally unneeded. The amount of energy contributed by conventional explosives is pretty miniscule compared to the energy of the impact itself, and there's no atmosphere to carry concussive shockwaves. Warheads can be set for "proximity burst", but that's more of a shotgun effect - showering the target with numerous sub-caliber slugs.

Considering the overall level of detail of the Spaceships line, I wouldn't worry about whether shells are technically pi++ or cr ex, and just stick to Wound Modifier x1.
Agree. When it comes to cannons, I'd really rather have armoury and vehicles anyway, though those (especially Armoury) will never come out in my lifetime, so that's just dreaming. Still, beams have a million different types, and guns just have "proximity or not" because APEP or hyperdense rounds aren't a thing in space, I guess. Or plasma lance rounds or vortex shells or whatever.

Hmmm. I wonder if you could work out a semi-reliable system for making alternate shell-types work.
__________________
My Blog: Mailanka's Musing. Currently Playing: Psi-Wars, a step-by-step exploration of building your own Space Opera setting, inspired by Star Wars.
Mailanka is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2014, 09:59 AM   #2
vierasmarius
 
vierasmarius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Oregon
Default Re: [Spaceships]Piercing And Other Damage Types

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mailanka View Post
Hmmm. I wonder if you could work out a semi-reliable system for making alternate shell-types work.
Some of the warheads from UT could be used as-is. The main problem is that they tend to be lackluster compared to standard kinetic rounds. For example, a 10cm Plasma warhead deals 6d dDam, compared to a normal 10cm's 15d dDam (at 1 mps). Specialty rounds may look more promising, but again it can be hard to make use of them. A 10cm Psi-Bomb warhead has a radius of 16 yards, meaning you'd need a dead-center hit to engulf an SM +7 ship, and larger ships would only be partially affected. These would still be useful for capturing enemy ships intact.

EDIT: Decided to drop by the Designer's Notes to refresh my memory on the Plasma Lance warhead. That's one that could actually be competitive with some projectiles, because of its high basic damage and armor divisor. A 10cm Plasma Lance deals 12d(10); a kinetic warhead would need a relative velocity of 4 mps to achieve the same penetration. Of course, spaceships tend to have far weaker armor than what's found in UT, so there may not be much demand for it. Plus, the Plasma Lance is TL11^, by which point spaceships may be packing Gravity Guns with a minimum velocity of 5 mps. These warheads may still have a niche as cheap bunker-buster bombs (using the bomb rules from SS4).

Last edited by vierasmarius; 08-14-2014 at 10:36 AM.
vierasmarius is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
spaceships


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Fnords are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.