Steve Jackson Games - Site Navigation
Home General Info Follow Us Search Illuminator Store Forums What's New Other Games Ogre GURPS Munchkin Our Games: Home

Go Back   Steve Jackson Games Forums > Roleplaying > Roleplaying in General

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-04-2014, 07:53 PM   #1
Anthony
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Berkeley, CA
Default Re: Is The trope that wizards can't use armor just an arbitrary limitation?

Quote:
Originally Posted by sir_pudding View Post
Neither Merlin nor Gandalf are typically depicted as heavily armored.
Heavy armor was largely absent in LoTR, and Merlin was, well, a royal adviser, not a soldier.
__________________
My GURPS site and Blog.
Anthony is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2014, 08:01 PM   #2
sir_pudding
Wielder of Smart Pants
 
sir_pudding's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Ventura CA
Default Re: Is The trope that wizards can't use armor just an arbitrary limitation?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Anthony View Post
Heavy armor was largely absent in LoTR, and Merlin was, well, a royal adviser, not a soldier.
Sure, but there's hardly any examples of spell-casting fantasy wizards prior to D&D at all. Prospero and the Weird Ladies also don't wear any armor.
sir_pudding is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2014, 08:15 PM   #3
whswhs
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Lawrence, KS
Default Re: Is The trope that wizards can't use armor just an arbitrary limitation?

Quote:
Originally Posted by sir_pudding View Post
Sure, but there's hardly any examples of spell-casting fantasy wizards prior to D&D at all. Prospero and the Weird Ladies also don't wear any armor.
Elric of Melniboné. Sheelba of the Seven Eyes and Ningauble of the Eyeless Face.

Bill Stoddard
whswhs is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2014, 08:20 PM   #4
sir_pudding
Wielder of Smart Pants
 
sir_pudding's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Ventura CA
Default Re: Is The trope that wizards can't use armor just an arbitrary limitation?

Quote:
Originally Posted by whswhs View Post
Elric of Melniboné.
Which is clearly one of the inspirations for Pathfinder's Magus class. I'm just saying there's obviously a source for the robes and pointy hat wizard that predates D&D.
sir_pudding is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2014, 08:26 PM   #5
Agemegos
 
Agemegos's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Oz
Default Re: Is The trope that wizards can't use armor just an arbitrary limitation?

Quote:
Originally Posted by sir_pudding View Post
Which is clearly one of the inspirations for Pathfinder's Magus class. I'm just saying there's obviously a source for the robes and pointy hat wizard that predates D&D.
Yes. Especially with astrological symbols embroidered on the robe it is the get-up of a mediaeval doctor.

Likewise with potions made of weird ingredients, magical incantations in obsolete languages, slips of paper with magical words and diagrams on them worn as amulets, gathering ingredients and making potions at astrologically-defined times and while repeating incantations in obsolete languages, etc.

Medicine has come a long way since Semmelweiss and Lister.
__________________

Decay is inherent in all composite things.
Nod head. Get treat.
Agemegos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2014, 08:27 PM   #6
whswhs
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Lawrence, KS
Default Re: Is The trope that wizards can't use armor just an arbitrary limitation?

Quote:
Originally Posted by sir_pudding View Post
Which is clearly one of the inspirations for Pathfinder's Magus class. I'm just saying there's obviously a source for the robes and pointy hat wizard that predates D&D.
Sure. But there are two different concepts here: The wizard who doesn't go around in armor, and the wizard who is not allowed to wear armor. Or use weapons. Does your mage not pick up that sword because he hasn't been trained to use it, or because it's magically impossible for him to do so, or because his magic will desert him if he messes with weapons? Gandalf, at least, was a pretty impressive swordsman. Or swordsmaia.

Bill Stoddard
whswhs is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2014, 11:31 PM   #7
Irish Wolf
 
Irish Wolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Earth, mostly
Default Re: Is The trope that wizards can't use armor just an arbitrary limitation?

Can't speak to original D&D, but AD&D's first edition specified that metallic armors were incompatible with higher magics. They also claimed that mailed gauntlets would interfere with the subtle gestures needed to case spells.
__________________
If you break the laws of Man, you go to prison.

If you break the laws of God, you go to Hell.

If you break the laws of Physics, you go to Sweden and receive a Nobel Prize.
Irish Wolf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2014, 03:30 AM   #8
The Colonel
 
The Colonel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Default Re: Is The trope that wizards can't use armor just an arbitrary limitation?

This sort of thing seems to assume a class based RPG - I've only encountered it outside class based games in a context where it appears to be a deliberate attempt to mimic the same effect.
The main reason seems to be either PvP balance or niche protection - explanations given as fluff rarely make any sense.
And of course, there's "that one specific class based RPG" with its origins in wargaming where "magic users" and "fighting men" were simply different kinds of unit with different capabilities, without needing to probe too far into the underlying reality of the thing.
The whole "you can't do it at all because stuff" position is distinctly old school - the modern trend (and the same trend that has always existed in non-class systems) would be towards "you can try, but you'll suck at it" ... which seems far more congruent.

Mythically speaking, wizards tend not to wander about in armour (although sword wielding seems reasonably common), but on the other hand they tend not to shoot fireballs either. Also, most mythic wizards are (or appear to be) very old, which may also impair their fighting ability.
The Colonel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2014, 09:13 AM   #9
shawnhcorey
 
shawnhcorey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: The Great White North
Default Re: Is The trope that wizards can't use armor just an arbitrary limitation?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Irish Wolf View Post
Can't speak to original D&D, but AD&D's first edition specified that metallic armors were incompatible with higher magics. They also claimed that mailed gauntlets would interfere with the subtle gestures needed to case spells.
Yes, that seems to be derived from folk tales the the magical fair folk, that is, the Fae, cannot abide iron in any form.
__________________
How do you keep a fool busy? Turn upside down for answer.
˙ɹǝʍsuɐ ɹoɟ uʍop ǝpısdn uɹnʇ ¿ʎsnq ןooɟ ɐ dǝǝʞ noʎ op ʍoɥ
shawnhcorey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2014, 09:01 AM   #10
Polydamas
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Central Europe
Default Re: Is The trope that wizards can't use armor just an arbitrary limitation?

Quote:
Originally Posted by whswhs View Post
Elric of Melniboné. Sheelba of the Seven Eyes and Ningauble of the Eyeless Face.

Bill Stoddard
And quite a few Robert E. Howard enemies and third parties. Dr. Karadur of Mulvan was too old and frail for armour, and Harold Shea didn't wear armour either ... but early L. Sprague de Camp seems to have got his fencing from the likes of Egerton Castle rather than Alfred Hutton.
__________________
"It is easier to banish a habit of thought than a piece of knowledge." H. Beam Piper

This forum got less aggravating when I started using the ignore feature
Polydamas is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
armor, rules, wizards


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Fnords are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:36 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.