|
|
|
#131 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: a crooked, creaky manse built on a blasted heath
|
Thus ''looks like."
One thing to say in favor of your model/approach is this: The setting already has gravitic tech. That's used instead of spin or acceleration simulated gravity vessels and space stations, or so it seems. And IIRC, the actual drive system of the Firefly-class vessel works through gravity manipulation. It also seems that the terraforming uses gravtics. And wasn't there an episode in which some sort of invisible gravity "clamp" grounded the Serenity? If one's going to use gravitic miracle tech, I'd mine that vein for various applications, rather than toss in a lot of other stuff.
I suppose they cannot micronize this tech, as we don't see it used in things like hand weapons or personal protection. |
|
|
|
|
|
#132 |
|
Wielder of Smart Pants
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Ventura CA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#133 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: a crooked, creaky manse built on a blasted heath
|
No.
A pseudo velocity gravitic warp drive? That's more plausible than the super system? The super system orbital mechanics can be made to work with current understanding of physics, yes? Of course it would be artificial/designed on purpose by an intelligence. |
|
|
|
|
|
#134 |
|
Wielder of Smart Pants
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Ventura CA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#135 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: a crooked, creaky manse built on a blasted heath
|
Oh, I agree that it's more plausible than FTL.
Is it more plausible than an intelligent design super system? Not really, except for one thing. The setting already has gravitic tech. That's a very strong argument in favor of your preferred warp+ cluster approach, if gravitics are already part of the deal. If I were, like the OP, designing a new setting with some ideas drawn from Firefly, I would not include gravitics. I'd use slow ships from Earth, terraforming that wasn't so perfect, and a miraculous super system. That would end up looking rather different. Sort of a Terradyne thing, or I guess a bit like what Astro started with his Twelve Dancing Sisters. Last edited by combatmedic; 06-10-2014 at 10:48 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#136 |
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
|
We can't detect Earth-like planets, let alone supertech-compressible moons, so I don't get this "if the verse existed within 100 light years we'd have found it already." Have we even looked that closely at all the systems within 100 light years?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#137 |
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
|
We've looked closely enough to notice five main sequence stars including...somehow...a blue giant in a quintuple solar system.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#138 |
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#139 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: a crooked, creaky manse built on a blasted heath
|
Quote:
It doesn't seem that the tech in FF is quite up to rearranging all those planets and moons, though. Altering them, yes. But as presented, the 'Verse was already arranged in such a fashion that many planets and moons existed within the so-called habitable zone. It was like that when the humans found it. Now, for a new FF-inspired setting, the humans could have juggled and reset all those orbits, re-engineering the entire system. But consider what that says about the tech level and resources of the civilization.... I'm not saying it can't be done. I'm saying I would not do it. YMMV |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#140 |
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
|
I believe we can rule out blue giants within 100 ly altogether. On ay sort of stellar timescale blue giants pop like popcorn (10 million years). They just aren't packed together like popcorn.
__________________
Fred Brackin |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| brainstorming, custom setting, firefly, serenity |
|
|