|
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Join Date: Mar 2013
|
Yes, but it uses a lot less fuel. The F1 has a 2.27:1 ratio of oxidizer to fuel
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Berkeley, CA
|
The systems you mentioned are rocket engines. They don't change fuel consumption for atmospheric use -- if you want to use less fuel, you'll need an air-breathing engine.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Join Date: Mar 2013
|
The thread of discussion had moved onto rocket engines with air intakes
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Berkeley, CA
|
The performance of such engines is at best incidentally related to the performance of rocket engines from fuel tanks, as liquid oxygen has somewhere on the order of 5,000 times the oxidizer density of air. Realistically, you probably need a completely different engine, and in any case you should model it as a ramjet or scramjet, not a rocket.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| spaceships |
|
|