Just a quick question about quirks

[sir_pudding]

Originally Posted by malloyd

That is, even if SJ were to offer an answer to any particular question like this, which you could then label official, no one writing any particular rule you think it makes a difference for made any effort to write it to be consistent with whatever answer you got. I suppose you could then be *certain* two (one supposes equally official) rules conflict with each other, rather than just thinking that might be the case, but I don't see what you gain from that.

I fairly sure that all published stuff is consistent with the Basic Set, unless specifically labelled optional. The writer's guidelines certainly require that writers are consistent with prior material.