Spaceships: Getting rid of cabins

[Schilcote]

I have a spaceship (which I already designed in non-game-mechanic terms) that I'm trying to recreate in Spaceships terms. Problem is, it's a big honkin' cargo freighter, so it's SM+12... but it's only supposed to have 12 crew quarters (and those aren't even full, it's just got the players in it). Since the 'habitat' component contains 600 cabins, this is a bit of a problem.

Does anyone have a different way of representing crew quarters that doesn't conflict so much with the established design? I suppose I could fill it with minifacs, saying they represent a big workshop that isn't quite big enough to count as 1/6th of a hull section.

[Humabout]

Not sure if it's RAW or not, but you can trade a cabin for 5 tons of steerage cargo - that is, it's pressurized and climate-controlled.

[Nereidalbel]

Convert unnecessary cabin space into extra storage space. The examples and such in the books aren't the universal law of every design ever.

[Irenaeus]

Either use the remaining cabins for steerage, or expand upon the "smaller systems rule". Replace one of the SM+12 systems with 100 SM+8 systems. Make 2 of them habitats and 98 cargo bays, and you get 12 cabins and 4900 tons of upressurized cargo holds.

You can also replace some more of the SM+8 Cargo Holds with other utilities without using a full SM+12 system, so it's a very flexible design solution.

[Schilcote]

Originally Posted by Irenaeus

Either use the remaining cabins for steerage, or expand upon the "smaller systems rule". Replace one of the SM+12 systems with 100 SM+8 systems. Make 2 of them habitats and 98 cargo bays, and you get 12 cabins and 4900 tons of upressurized cargo holds.

You can also replace some more of the SM+8 Cargo Holds with other utilities without using a full SM+12 system, so it's a very flexible design solution.

Ooh, I like this.

[The Wrathchild]

Never has thinking inside the box been more elegant! :-)

[Schilcote]

Actually, it's more of a three-dimensional oval (is there a word for that?).

[vicky_molokh]

Originally Posted by Schilcote

Actually, it's more of a three-dimensional oval (is there a word for that?).

Ovoid. Or just egg (from which both oval and ovoid are derived, directly or not).

[Humabout]

Originally Posted by vicky_molokh

Ovoid. Or just egg (from which both oval and ovoid are derived, directly or not).

Don't forget ellipsoid!

[vicky_molokh]

Originally Posted by Humabout

Don't forget ellipsoid!

That would be much more mathematically precise than an ovoid.

("An oval is an ellipse-shaped circle drawn inside a square of a 2:1 length/width ratio.")