|
|
|
#13 | ||||
|
GURPS Line Editor
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Montréal, Québec
|
Quote:
Given that the appendix added to the Basic Set, Third Edition Revised – and ultimately, all of Compendium I and II – came to be seen as "required," even though SJ Games didn't force them down throats, it stands to reason that any addendum or compendium for the Basic Set, Fourth Edition would come to be seen as "required." As we already get a lot of flak for how large the Basic Set, Fourth Edition is, I think that if we did have a serious internal discussion, we would conclude that an intermediate edition would be suicidally bad. At 576 pages plus appendices and/or compendia, the game would be lambasted by the hobby and summarily executed. See above, really . . . Inasmuch as a revision would even be considered, it's certainly the case that we would focus on adding in innovations from GURPS Fourth Edition supplements published since 2004. We would not re-revisit GURPS Third Edition supplements. A stated goal of the multi-year process of revising 3e to 4e was putting those old works to bed going forward. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
— Ultimately, I think that a lot of "missing" content is actually out there in either the Basic Set, Fourth Edition or a PDF. Current thinking at SJ Games is to sell add-on content via PDFs on e23, and I somewhat doubt that we would steal the thunder from existing publications by republishing key rules in a collection. Considering those rules for a future full edition – in the 2020s, as others have said – is a whole other issue. That is very likely what we would do, assuming there is a 5e someday.
__________________
Sean "Dr. Kromm" Punch <kromm@sjgames.com> GURPS Line Editor, Steve Jackson Games My DreamWidth [Just GURPS News] |
||||
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|